Layer connective fields from ultrafast resting-state fMRI differentiate feedforward from feedback signaling
Carvalho, J.
Show abstract
Deciphering the directionality of information flow in cortical circuits is essential for understanding brain dynamics, learning, and neuroplasticity after injury. However, current non-invasive methods cannot distinguish feedforward (FF) from feedback (FB) signals across entire networks, including deep brain regions. Here, we present a novel approach combining ultrafast fMRI with a Layer-based Connective Field (lCF) model to disentangle FF from FB signaling. Our findings reveal that lCF size, an indicator of spatial information integration, differentiates FF and FB activity through distinct layer-specific connectivity patterns during spontaneous activity, challenging the notion that FF signals are solely stimulus-driven. FF connectivity follows an inverted U-shape, peaking in layer IV, while FB exhibits a U-shaped pattern, with peaks in layers I and VI. These profiles generalize across sensory pathways (visual, somatosensory, and motor) and reveal injury-induced network reorganization, such as LGN bypassing V1 to provide direct FF input to higher visual areas.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal identification of the mouse brain using simultaneous Ca2+ imaging and fMRI 97%
- Unraveling the mesoscale resting-state functional connectivity of ocular dominance columns in humans using high-resolution functional MRI. 97%
- The spatial layout of antagonistic brain regions is explicable based on geometric principles 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial processing of limbs reveals the center-periphery bias in high level visual cortex follows a nonlinear topography 97%
- Brain-wide projections and differential encoding of prefrontal neuronal classes underlying learned and innate threat avoidance 96%
- Functional Localization of an Attenuating Filter within Cortex for a Selective Detection Task in Mice 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.