Back

Examining the associations between the food environment and dietary intake in British Columbia: A cross-sectional study

Zhao, B.; Cohen, T. C.; Sutherland, J.; Meza, R.; Bhatti, P.; Murphy, R. A.

2025-02-24 nutrition
10.1101/2025.02.22.25322725 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study aimed to characterize neighbourhood food environments in British Columbia (BC) and to determine if food environment characteristics were associated with fruits and vegetables (FV) intake. A cross-sectional study was conducted using geospatial food environment (Can-FED) and neighbourhood environment measures from the BC Generations Project, a cohort of males and females aged 35-69. Food environment measures (chain grocery stores, fast food outlets, convenience stores, and two relative measures of food outlets) were categorized according to density: class 0 (no presence) to class 4 (highest density). Multivariable mixed-effect models adjusted for sociodemographics and neighbourhood characteristics were constructed to assess the associations between food environments and FV intakes as a continuous variable and as <5 or [&ge;] 5 servings of FV/day. Approximately 50% of participants lived in neighbourhoods without chain grocery stores, fast food outlets or convenience stores within walking distance. An inverse association between neighbourhoods with the highest density of fast-food restaurants and FV consumption was observed (Odds ratio (OR) =0.89, 95% CI: 0.80, 0.98). Associations between chain grocery stores, convenience stores and FV consumption were attenuated with adjustment for neighbourhood characteristics: walkability, material and social deprivation. The findings suggest the presence of food deserts across urban areas in BC. Participants living in neighbourhoods with greater density of fast-food restaurants were less likely to consume [&ge;]5 servings of FV per day. Further studies are needed to understand the lack of associations between other characteristics of the food environment and dietary intake.

Published in BMJ Open (predicted rank #11) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.