Understanding barriers to effective injury care in low-income contexts: a mixed methods analysis of insights from medical trainees and traffic law enforcement first responders in Uganda
Lule, H.; Oguttu, B.; Mugerwa, M.; Wilson, M. L.; Posti, J. P.
Show abstract
BackgroundInjury-related mortality exhibits a significant social gradient, particularly in low-middle-income countries (LMICs), with approximately 4.5 million premature deaths annually. ObjectiveThis study explores prehospital and in-hospital barriers to timely injury care as perceived by frontline healthcare personnel in Uganda. MethodsWe utilized a mixed methods approach, gathering qualitative data from five hundred frontline workers including surgical residents, interns, and law enforcement professionals, alongside quantitative data from 1,003 trauma patients. Barriers were categorized into pre- and in-hospital trauma team-related, patient-related, and systemic healthcare challenges. ResultsFrom frontline workers, prehospital barriers included delays in emergency medical services activation (21.2%), ambulance arrival (19.3%), and transportation to hospitals (15.2%) whereas in-hospital barriers primarily involved supply shortages (28.3%), delays in identifying life-threatening injuries (27.3%), and insufficient critical care services (26.3%). Among the 1003 audited trauma patients, 41.5% (n=416) faced barriers during treatment. The most common barriers were delays in treatment decisions (n=232, 23.1%) and securing necessary supplies (n=180, 17.9%). Presence of a barrier correlated with higher odds of unfavourable Glasgow Outcome Scale scores compared to those without barriers [OR 1.750, 95% CI (1.497-2.047) vs. OR 0.556, 95% CI (0.436-0.708), p<0.001]. Moreover, the odds of mortality were higher for those whom a barrier was encountered compared to those where there was no barrier [OR 1.901, 95% CI (1.057-3.420) vs. OR 0.588, 95% CI (0.397-0.869), p<0.001]. ConclusionsOur findings highlight the need for multifaceted targeted interventions, integrating frontline healthcare perspectives to improve trauma care delivery in LMICs which face both prehospital and in-hospital disparities to accessing injury care.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Community Support for Injured Patients: A Scoping Review and Narrative Synthesis 96%
- Exploring Burn First Aid Knowledge and Water Lavage Practices in Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study. 95%
- Getting to the Emergency Department in Time: Interviews With Patients and Their Caregivers on the Challenges to Emergency Care Utilization in Rural Uganda - a Grounded Theory Approach 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Is higher-level trauma center care associated with better outcomes in patients injured by low-energy trauma? 94%
- Diversity of CPR manikins for basic life support education: Use of manikin sex, race, and body shape – A scoping review 94%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mortality Outcomes in Task-Sharing for Emergency Care: Impact of Emergency Physician Supervision on Non-Physician Emergency Care in Rural Uganda 95%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 95%
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare workers preparedness for COVID-19 pandemic in the occupied Palestinian territory: a cross-sectional survey 93%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.