Unconscious Neural Activity Predicts Overt Attention in Visual Search
Nadra, J. G.; Bengson, J. J.; Mangun, G. R.
Show abstract
Unconscious neural activity has been shown to precede both motor and cognitive acts. In the present study, we investigated the neural antecedents of overt attention during visual search, where subjects make voluntary saccadic eye movements to search a cluttered stimulus array for a target item. Building on studies of both overt self-generated motor actions (Lau et al., 2004, Soon et al., 2008) and self-generated cognitive actions (Bengson et al., 2014, Soon et al., 2013), we hypothesized that brain activity prior to the onset of a search array would predict the direction of the first saccade during unguided visual search. Because both spatial attention and gaze are coordinated during visual search, both cognition and motor actions are coupled during visual search. A well-established finding in fMRI studies of willed action is that neural antecedents of the intention to make a motor act (e.g., reaching) can be identified seconds before the action occurs. Studies of the volitional control of covert spatial attention in EEG have shown that predictive brain activity is limited to only a few hundred milliseconds before a voluntary shift of covert spatial attention. In the present study, the visual search task and stimuli were designed so that subjects could not predict the onset of the search array. Perceptual task difficulty was high, such that they could not locate the target using covert attention alone, thus requiring overt shifts of attention (saccades) to carry out the visual search. If the first saccade to the array onset in unguided visual search shares mechanisms with willed shifts of covert attention, we expected predictive EEG alpha-band activity (8-12 Hz) immediately prior to the array onset (within 1 sec) (Bengson et al., 2014; Nadra et al., 2023). Alternatively, if they follow the principles of willed motor actions, predictive neural signals should be reflected in broadband EEG activity (Libet et al., 1983) and would likely emerge earlier (Soon et al., 2008). Applying support vector machine decoding, we found that the direction of the first saccade in an unguided visual search could be predicted up to two seconds preceding the search arrays onset in the broadband but not alpha-band EEG. These findings suggest that self-directed eye movements in visual search emerge from early preparatory neural activity more akin to willed motor actions than to covert willed attention. This highlights a distinct role for unconscious neural dynamics in shaping visual search behavior.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Electrophysiological Markers of Statistically Learned Attentional Enhancement: Evidence for a Saliency Based Mechanism 97%
- Neural signatures of competition between voluntary and involuntary influences over the focus of attention in visual working memory 96%
- Suppressive interactions between nearby stimuli in visual cortex reflect crowding 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- To See, Not to See, or to See Poorly: Perceptual Quality and Guess Rate as a Function of Electroencephalography (EEG) Brain Activity in an Orientation Perception Task 97%
- Active search signatures in a free-viewing task exploiting concurrent EEG and eye movements recordings 96%
- Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Oscillatory Brain Activity during the Observation of Actions and Interactions between Point-light Agents 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamics of alpha suppression and enhancement may be related to resource competition in cross-modal cortical regions 96%
- Lateralized alpha activity and slow potentials shifts over visual cortex track the time course of both endogenous and exogenous orienting of attention 96%
- Causal Effects of Pupil Size on Visual Processing 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.