Back

Context-Dependent and Gene-Specific Role of Chromatin Architecture Mediated by Histone Modifiers and Loop-extrusion Machinery

Tastemel, M.; Jussila, A. P.; Saravanan, B.; Huang, H.; Xie, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Armand, E.; Ren, B.

2025-02-25 genomics
10.1101/2025.02.21.639596 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Loop-extrusion machinery, comprising the cohesin complex and CCCTC-binding factor CTCF, organizes the interphase chromosomes into topologically associating domains (TADs) and loops, but acute depletion of components of this machinery results in variable transcriptional changes in different cell types, highlighting the complex relationship between chromatin organization and gene regulation. Here, we systematically investigated the role of 3D genome architecture in gene regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells under various perturbation conditions. We found that acute depletion of cohesin or CTCF disrupts the formation of TADs, but affects gene regulation in a gene-specific and context-dependent manner. Furthermore, the loop extrusion machinery was dispensable for transcription from most genes in steady state, consistent with prior results, but became critical for a large number of genes during transition of cellular states. Through a genome-wide CRISPR screen, we uncovered multiple factors that can modulate the role of loop extrusion machinery in gene regulation in a gene-specific manner. Among them were the MORF acetyltransferase complex members (Kat6b, Ing5, Brpf1), which could antagonize the transcriptional insulation mediated by CTCF and cohesin complex at developmental genes. Interestingly, inhibition of Kat6b partially rescues the insulator defects in cells lacking the cohesin loader Nipbl, mutations of which are responsible for the developmental disorder Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Taken together, our findings uncovered interplays between the loop extrusion machinery and histone modifying complex that underscore the context-dependent and gene-specific role of the 3D genome.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.