White-matter controllability at birth predicts social engagement and language outcomes in toddlerhood
Sun, H.; Vernetti, A.; Spann, M.; Chawarska, K.; Ment, L.; Scheinost, D.
Show abstract
Social engagement and language are connected through early development. Alterations in their development can have a prolonged impact on childrens lives. However, the role of white matter at birth in this ongoing connection is less well-known. Here, we investigate how white matter at birth jointly supports social engagement and language outcomes in 642 infants. We use edge-centric network control theory to quantify edge controllability, or the ability of white-matter connections to drive transitions between diverse brain states, at 1 month. Next, we used connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) to predict the Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (Q-CHAT) for social engagement risks and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID-III) for language skills at 18 months from edge controllability. We created the social engagement network (SEN) to predict Q-CHAT scores and the language network (LAN) to predict BSID-III scores. The SEN and LAN were complex, spanning the whole brain. They also significantly overlapped in anatomy and generalized across measures. Controllability in the SEN at 1 month partially mediated associations between Q-CHAT and BSID-III language scores at 18 months. Further, controllability in the SEN significantly differed between term and preterm infants and predicted Q-CHAT scores in an external sample of preterm infants. Together, our results suggest that the intertwined nature of social engagement and language development is rooted in an infants white-matter controllability. Significance StatementDuring infancy and toddlerhood, social engagement and language emerge together. Delays are often observed in both simultaneously. These interactions persist into later childhood, potentially affecting life quality. We reveal that the interplay between social engagement and language milestones in toddlerhood is rooted in the infants structural connectivity, which may assist in early risk identification of developmental delays. Insights into the early brain foundations for emerging social engagement and language skills may open opportunities for individualized interventions to improve developmental outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain age prediction and deviations from normative trajectories in the neonatal connectome 98%
- Neonatal brain dynamic functional connectivity in term and preterm infants and its association with early childhood neurodevelopment 97%
- Atypical language network lateralization is reflected throughout the macroscale functional organization of cortex 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subtly altered topological asymmetry of brain structural covariance networks in autism spectrum disorder across 43 datasets from the ENIGMA consortium 95%
- Uncovering the Genetic Profiles Underlying the Intrinsic Organization of the Human Cerebellum 95%
- The universe is asymmetric, the mouse brain too. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain and molecular mechanisms underlying the nonlinear association between close friendships, mental health, and cognition in children 96%
- Intrinsic excitation-inhibition imbalance affects medial prefrontal cortex differently in autistic men versus women 95%
- Neurotransmitter Transporter/Receptor Co-Expression Shares Organizational Traits With Brain Structure And Function 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- No evidence for a relationship between social closeness and similarity in resting-state functional brain connectivity in schoolchildren 94%
- Experience sampling reveals the role that covert goal states play in task-relevant behavior. 94%
- Electrophysiological resting-state signatures link polygenic scores to general intelligence 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.