Back

Artificial intelligence-enabled automated analysis of transmission electron micrographs to evaluate chemotherapy impact on mitochondrial morphology in triple negative breast cancer

Arriojas, A.; baek, M. L.; Berner, M. J.; Zhurkevich, A.; Hinton, A. O.; Meyer, M. D.; Dobrolecki, L. E.; Lewis, M. T.; Zarringhalam, K.; Echeverria, G. V.

2025-02-23 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.02.19.635300 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Advancements in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) have enabled in-depth studies of biological specimens, offering new avenues to large-scale imaging experiments with subcellular resolution. Mitochondrial structure is of growing interest in cancer biology due to its crucial role in regulating the multi-faceted functions of mitochondria. We and others have established the crucial role of mitochondria in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited therapeutic options. Building upon our previous work demonstrating the regulatory role of mitochondrial structure dynamics in the metabolic adaptations and survival of chemotherapy-refractory TNBC cells, we sought to extend those findings to a large-scale analysis of transmission electron micrographs. Here we present a U-Net artificial intelligence (AI) model for automatic annotation and assessment of mitochondrial morphology and feature quantification. Our model is trained on 11,039 manually annotated mitochondria across 125 micrographs derived from a variety of orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse model tumors and adherent cell cultures. The model achieves an F1 score of 0.85 on test micrographs at the pixel level. To validate the ability of our model to detect expected mitochondrial structural changes, we utilized micrographs from mouse primary skeletal muscle cells genetically modified to lack Dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1). The algorithm successfully detected a significant increase in mitochondrial elongation, in alignment with the well-established role of Drp1 as a driver of mitochondrial fission. Further, we subjected in vitro and in vivo TNBC models to conventional chemotherapy treatments commonly used for clinical management of TNBC, including doxorubicin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, and docetaxel (DTX). We found substantial within-sample heterogeneity of mitochondrial structure in both in vitro and in vivo TNBC models and observed a consistent reduction in mitochondrial elongation in DTX-treated specimens. We went on to compare mammary tumors and matched lung metastases in a highly metastatic PDX model of TNBC, uncovering significant increase in mitochondrial length in metastatic lesions compared to their cognate mammary tumor. This dataset provides high statistical power to detect frequent chemotherapy-induced shifts in mitochondrial shapes and sizes in residual cells left behind after treatment. The successful application of our AI model to capture mitochondrial structure marks a step forward in high-throughput analysis of mitochondrial structures, enhancing our understanding of how morphological changes may relate to chemotherapy efficacy and mechanism of action. Our large, manually curated electron micrograph dataset - now publicly available - serves as a unique gold-standard resource for developing, benchmarking, and applying computational models, while further advancing investigations into mitochondrial morphology and its impact on breast cancer biology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.4%
2
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.1%
4
npj Imaging
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
5
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
9
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.2%
11
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.2%
12
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.8%
14
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.2%
17
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
18
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
19
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
20
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Journal of Microscopy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
24
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
26
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%