Exploring Causal Association between Neuroticism Subclusters and Risk of Coronary Atherosclerosis: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis based on Genome-Wide Association Studies
Ming, J.; Li, R.-l.; Gao, Y.-l.; Huang, S.-t.; Yao, X.-y.; Tan, Q.; Zong, M.; Fan, L.-y.
Show abstract
BackgroundUnderstanding the risk factors associated with coronary atherosclerosis (CA)--an evident cardiovascular disease--is vital. This study aimed to explore the causal relationship between neuroticism subclusters and CA, focusing on lipids as mediators, using genome-wide association studies and Mendelian randomization (MR). Methods and ResultsInstrumental variables were selected based on their genetic associations with neuroticism subclusters and CA. Causal effects were primarily assessed using inverse variance-weighted (IVW) methods. Sensitivity analyses and colocalization analyses were conducted, and possible confounders were determined using multivariable MR analysis. IVW modeling revealed that neuroticism subclusters significantly affect CA risk (ebi-a-GCST006475 odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.01-1.03, P = 1.52E-05; ebi-a-GCST006478 OR: 1.01, 95%CI: 1.00-1.02, P = 0.026; ebi-a-GCST006950 OR: 1.01, 95%CI: 1.00-1.02, P = 0.036). Cochrans Q test demonstrated moderate heterogeneity (ebi-a-GCST006475, P < 0.05, I{superscript 2} = 28%). The Steiger test confirmed the correct causal direction (P < 0.05). Multivariable MR remained significant after adjusting for confounders (P < 0.05). Mediation analyses suggested that lipids partially mediated the neuroticism-CA effect. ConclusionsOverall, our findings indicated a causal link between neuroticism subclusters and CA, with lipids partially mediating this relationship, emphasizing the role of psychosocial factors in cardiovascular risk assessment and intervention strategies.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A multi-omics study of circulating phospholipid markers of blood pressure 95%
- What multiple Mendelian randomization approaches reveal about obesity and gout 93%
- Environment-wide association study (EWAS) on cardiometabolic traits: A systematic assessment of the association of lifestyle variables on a longitudinal setting 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Blood pressure, cardiometabolic traits and cardiovascular events in women with uterine fibroids: a genetic correlation and Mendelian randomization study 94%
- The association between clonal hematopoiesis driver mutations, immune cell function and the vasculometabolic complications of obesity 93%
- Chromosome 10q24.32 Variants Associate with Brain Arterial Diameters in Diverse Populations: A Genome-Wide Association Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gender- and Age-Specific Associations of Visit-To-Visit Blood Pressure Variability with Incident Generalized Anxiety Disorder 92%
- Estimation of Life’s Essential 8 Score with Incomplete Data of Individual Metrics 92%
- Pathway-Specific Polygenic Risk Scores for Blood Pressure Traits in a West African Cohort 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolomics data improve 10-year cardiovascular risk prediction with the SCORE2 algorithm for the general population without cardiovascular disease or diabetes 94%
- Shared and distinct pathways from anxiety disorder and depression to cardiovascular disease: a UK Biobank prospective cohort study 92%
- Polygenic prediction of coronary heart disease among 130,000 Mexican adults 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolite Signature of Life’s Essential 8 and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease among Low-Income Black and White Americans 94%
- Transethnic meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies three new loci and characterizes population-specific differences for coronary artery disease 93%
- Augmenting clinical risk prediction of cardiovascular disease through protein and epigenetic biomarkers 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.