Risk Stratification for Endometrial Cancer Reveals Independent Contributions of Polygenic Risk and Body Mass Index
Wang, X.; Dossus, L.; Gunter, M. J.; Crosbie, E. J.; Ong, J.-S.; Glubb, D. M.; O'Mara, T. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundObesity is a major risk factor for endometrial cancer, but it is unknown whether it impacts the association between genetic risk and endometrial cancer. We incorporated polygenic risk score and epidemiological risk factors in the prediction of and investigated associations of BMI and polygenic risk score with endometrial cancer risk MethodsWe generated polygenic risk score for endometrial cancer in 129,829 unrelated female participants of European ancestry (including 956 incident cases with endometrial cancer) in the UK Biobank and predicted endometrial cancer using endometrial cancer polygenic risk score and established epidemiological risk factors, including BMI. We evaluated the performance of endometrial cancer prediction models by odds ratios and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) to using logistic regression. Individual and joint associations of BMI and polygenic risk score with endometrial cancer were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. ResultsAn integrated model incorporating both polygenic risk score and epidemiological risk factors achieved a modest, but statistically significant, improvement in predicting endometrial cancer status compared with the model that included epidemiologic risk factors alone (AUC = 0.74 versus 0.73; P = 3.98 x 10-5). Obese participants (BMI [≥] 30 kg/m2) in the top polygenic risk tertile had the highest endometrial cancer risk. We observed independent effects of genetic risk and BMI on endometrial cancer risk. ConclusionIntegrating polygenic risk score with epidemiological risk factors may offer insights into population stratification for endometrial cancer susceptibility. Higher endometrial cancer polygenic risk is associated with endometrial cancer, irrespective of BMI.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- CA125 and age-based models for ovarian cancer detection in primary care: a population-based external validation study 93%
- Observational and genetic associations between cardiorespiratory fitness and cancer: a UK Biobank and international consortia study 92%
- Cost-effectiveness of CA125- and age-informed risk-based triage for ovarian cancer detection in primary care 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis 96%
- Risk of cancer in regular and low meat-eaters, fish-eaters, and vegetarians: a prospective analysis of UK Biobank participants 94%
- The relationships between women’s reproductive factors: a Mendelian randomization analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Free testosterone and malignant melanoma risk in men: prospective analyses of testosterone and SHBG with 19 cancers in men and postmenopausal women UK Biobank 94%
- Circulating white blood cell traits and colorectal cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study 93%
- Long-Term Impact of Stressful Life Events on Breast Cancer Risk: A 36-Year Genetically Informed Prospective Study in the Finnish Twin Cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comprehensive Epithelial Tubo-Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Genetic and Epidemiological Risk Factors 95%
- Estimating cancer risk in carriers of Lynch syndrome variants in UK Biobank 94%
- Heritable genetic variants in key cancer genes link cancer risk with anthropometric traits 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-cancer genome-wide association study of endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer identifies genetic risk regions associated with risk of both cancers 94%
- Causal effects of breast cancer risk factors across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study 94%
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.