Back

Phylo-Plex: A phylogenetically informed, low-cost amplicon sequencing platform for deployable high-resolution genomic epidemiology

Beale, M. A.; Shetty, V.; Ambridge, K. E.; Lacey, G.; Dougan, S.; Roberts-Sengier, W.; Sampher, B.; Lassalle, F.; Dorman, M. J.; Mahlangu, M. P.; Venter, J. M.; Da Costa Dias, B.; Chipinduro, M.; Washaya, T. M.; Rodgers, L.; Makamure, B.; Dauya, E.; Marks, M.; Muller, E.; Ferrand, R. A.; Thomson, N. R.

2025-02-25 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.02.19.25322526 medRxiv
Show abstract

Genomic pathogen surveillance is a powerful tool for public health and research, but is costly and unachievable in low-resource settings. Most sub-genomic typing methods sacrifice resolution whilst remaining costly. We developed "Phylo-Plex", a novel approach that identifies information-rich genomic regions to maximise phylogenetic information whilst minimising the number of regions. Applied to Treponema pallidum and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, we designed a high-resolution multiplex PCR sequencing scheme for lineage tracking pathogens with different extremes of genome variation. For Treponema pallidum, we also designed and evaluated the Phylo-Plex scheme in the laboratory and field settings by sequencing 72 clinical samples using MinION Flongle cells. Our T. pallidum scheme comprising 59 multiplex amplicons achieved high discrimination of fine-scale sublineages comparable to those defined using whole genomes, and demonstrating a qPCR detection limit [&le;]Ct 32. Variant calls from MinION amplicon sequencing were highly correlated with Illumina whole genome sequencing. We successfully deployed the method in a low-resource laboratory in Zimbabwe, costed at <{pound}300/24 samples ({pound}12.47/sample). Phylo-Plex enables low-cost tracking of priority pathogenic lineages in low resource settings and at scale.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.