Back

Classifying the severity of diabetic macular oedema from optical coherence tomography scans using deep learning: a feasibility study.

Breathnach, C. L.; Harney, F.; Townley, D.; Hickey, R.; Simpkin, A.; O'Keeffe, D.

2025-02-21 ophthalmology
10.1101/2025.02.19.24317749
Show abstract

BackgroundDiabetic macular oedema (DME) is a vision-threatening complication of diabetes mellitus. It is reliably detected using optical coherence tomography (OCT). This work evaluates a deep learning system (DLS) for the automated detection and classification of DME severity from OCT images. MethodsAnonymised OCT images were retrospectively obtained from 950 patients at University Hospital Galway, Ireland. Images were graded by a consultant ophthalmologist to classify the level of DME present (normal, non-centre-involving DME, centre-involving DME) excluding other pathologies. A DLS was trained using cross-validation, then evaluated on a test dataset and an external dataset. The test set was graded by a second ophthalmologist for comparison. ResultsIn detecting the presence of DME, the DLS achieved a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.98 on cross-validation. AUCs of 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.98) and 0.94 (0.92-0.96) were achieved on evaluation of DME detection for the test dataset when graded by the first and second ophthalmologist respectively. An AUC of 0.94 (0.92-0.96) was achieved on evaluation with the external dataset. When detecting the DME severity, AUCs of 0.98, 0.86 and 0.99 were achieved per class on cross validation. For the test dataset, AUCs of 0.99, 0.89 and 0.98 were achieved when graded by the first ophthalmologist and AUCs of 0.96, 0.89 and 0.95 were achieved when graded by the second ophthalmologist. ConclusionThis study suggests promising results for the use of deep learning in the classification of severity of DME which could be used to automate screening for DME and direct appropriate referrals.

Matching journals

1
Eye
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
194× avg
2
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.2%
129× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 42%
12.1%
4
Ophthalmology Science
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.2%
144× avg
5
British Journal of Ophthalmology
BMJ · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.3%
119× avg
6
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 38%
4.8%
7
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 5%
4.8× avg
8
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 7%
3.6× avg
9
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.8%
37× avg
10
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 38%
1.9%
11
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 9%
2.2× avg
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 9%
2.5× avg
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 14%
0.9%
14
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 5%
3.9× avg
15
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 20%
0.7%
16
Annals of Translational Medicine
AME Publishing Company · based on 14 published papers
Top 4%
4.9× avg
17
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 31 published papers
Top 6%
3.3× avg