Back

Fabrication & characterization of hyaluronic acid/eucalyptus hydrogels loaded with PLGA nanoparticles with methotrexate as an Injectable therapy for rheumatoid arthritis

Castilla Bolanos, M. A.; Duenas-Rodriguez, M.; Bustamante-Paredes, L.; Castillo-Heins, S.

2025-02-23 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2025.02.18.638769 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease that affects about 250,000 Colombians, 82% of whom are women. Current treatments include disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as methotrexate (MTX), analgesics and physiotherapy. The most common DMARD is MTX, which binds to plasma proteins with low efficiency (50%) and has a half-life of 6 hours. Due to its limitations when administered orally, nanoparticles (NPs) have been proposed to overcome these limitations. NPs support the release of therapeutic molecules, minimizing side effects and increasing the bioavailability of the drug in a controlled administration. NPs synthesized from biodegradable polymers, such as polyglycolic lactic acid (PLGA), are convenient for drug delivery due to their high biocompatibility and ability to bind DMARDs such as MTX. PLGA NPs loaded with MTX (MTX-PLGA-NPs) have reduced the presence of proinflammatory factors such as IL-10 and TGF-{beta}, suggesting their potential as anti-inflammatory therapies for arthritis. Therefore, this study aims to develop MTX-PLGA-NPs in bioactive and biocompatible hyaluronic acid-eucalyptus (GelHA-E) hydrogels to preserve their stability and delay their degradation. PLGA-NPs were synthesized with an average hydrodynamic diameter of 200 nm, the 1237 cm-1 band found in FITR indicated the successful covalent conjugation with MTX; the mass loss of only 1% in GelHA-E indicated the thermogravimetric stability of the biomaterial and the low hemolytic and platelet aggregation percentage confirmed the biocompatibility of the biomaterial as a potential localized, anti-inflammatory, and injectable treatment for rheumatoid arthritis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.1%
2
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
4
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
10
Journal of Controlled Release
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
11
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
12
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Chemical Research in Toxicology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Advanced Therapeutics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
26
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%