Back

Investigating the relationship between breast cancer risk factors and an AI-generated mammographic texture feature in the Nurses' Health Study II

Wu, X.; Jiang, S.; Ge, A.; Turman, C.; Colditz, G. A.; Tamimi, R.; Kraft, P.

2025-02-20 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.02.18.25322419 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe mammogram risk score (MRS), an AI-driven texture feature derived from digital mammograms, strongly predicts breast cancer risk independently of breast density, though underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study investigated relationships between established breast cancer risk factors, covering anthropometrics, reproductive factors, family history, and mammographic density metrics, and MRS. MethodsUsing data from the Nurses Health Study II (292 cases, 561 controls), we validated MRSs association with breast cancer using logistic regression and evaluated its relationships with risk factors through: linear regressions of MRS on observed risk factors and polygenic scores associated with risk factors, and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis via two-stage least squares regression. We conducted two-sample MR of MRS using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies of risk factors. ResultsMRS was significantly associated with breast cancer risk before adjustment for BI-RADS density (OR=1.92 per SD increase in MRS; 95%CI:1.57-2.33; AUC=0.69) and after (OR=1.85; 95%CI:1.49-2.30). Early life body size and adult body mass index (BMI) were inversely associated with MRS, while history of benign breast disease and BI-RADS density showed positive associations; after adjusting for BI-RADS density, associations between MRS and the other three risk factors attenuated. Higher polygenic score for dense area was associated with increased MRS ({beta}=0.16 SD increase in MRS per SD increase in polygenic score; 95%CI: 0.06-0.25), as was percent density ({beta}=0.14; 95%CI:0.05-0.23). Two-sample MR identified associations between genetically predicted dense area ({beta}=0.83 SD increase in MRS per SD increase in dense area; 95%CI:0.39-1.27) and percent density ({beta}=1.14; 95%CI:0.55-1.74) with MRS. After adjusting for BI-RADS density and BMI, higher waist-to-hip ratio was significantly associated with increased MRS in polygenic score and two-sample MR analyses. No significant associations were observed with other risk factors. ConclusionWe validated MRSs association with breast cancer risk in cases diagnosed 0.5-10.1 years (median 2.6) after mammogram acquisition. Our findings reveal robust associations between breast density measures and MRS and suggest a potential impact of central obesity on MRS. Future larger-scale studies are crucial to validate these results and explore their potential to enhance our understanding of breast cancer etiology and refine risk prediction models.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
3
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
5
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
7
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
17
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
28
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%