Back

Investigating the relationship between breast cancer risk factors and an AI-generated mammographic texture feature in the Nurses' Health Study II

Wu, X.; Jiang, S.; Ge, A.; Turman, C.; Colditz, G. A.; Tamimi, R.; Kraft, P.

2025-02-20 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.02.18.25322419 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe mammogram risk score (MRS), an AI-driven texture feature derived from digital mammograms, strongly predicts breast cancer risk independently of breast density, though underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study investigated relationships between established breast cancer risk factors, covering anthropometrics, reproductive factors, family history, and mammographic density metrics, and MRS. MethodsUsing data from the Nurses Health Study II (292 cases, 561 controls), we validated MRSs association with breast cancer using logistic regression and evaluated its relationships with risk factors through: linear regressions of MRS on observed risk factors and polygenic scores associated with risk factors, and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis via two-stage least squares regression. We conducted two-sample MR of MRS using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies of risk factors. ResultsMRS was significantly associated with breast cancer risk before adjustment for BI-RADS density (OR=1.92 per SD increase in MRS; 95%CI:1.57-2.33; AUC=0.69) and after (OR=1.85; 95%CI:1.49-2.30). Early life body size and adult body mass index (BMI) were inversely associated with MRS, while history of benign breast disease and BI-RADS density showed positive associations; after adjusting for BI-RADS density, associations between MRS and the other three risk factors attenuated. Higher polygenic score for dense area was associated with increased MRS ({beta}=0.16 SD increase in MRS per SD increase in polygenic score; 95%CI: 0.06-0.25), as was percent density ({beta}=0.14; 95%CI:0.05-0.23). Two-sample MR identified associations between genetically predicted dense area ({beta}=0.83 SD increase in MRS per SD increase in dense area; 95%CI:0.39-1.27) and percent density ({beta}=1.14; 95%CI:0.55-1.74) with MRS. After adjusting for BI-RADS density and BMI, higher waist-to-hip ratio was significantly associated with increased MRS in polygenic score and two-sample MR analyses. No significant associations were observed with other risk factors. ConclusionWe validated MRSs association with breast cancer risk in cases diagnosed 0.5-10.1 years (median 2.6) after mammogram acquisition. Our findings reveal robust associations between breast density measures and MRS and suggest a potential impact of central obesity on MRS. Future larger-scale studies are crucial to validate these results and explore their potential to enhance our understanding of breast cancer etiology and refine risk prediction models.

Published in npj Breast Cancer (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.2%
npj Breast Cancer · published here
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
4
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
6
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
7
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.9%
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
10
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.1%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
13
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.8%
15
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.8%
19
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
Genetics in Medicine Open
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
36 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
26
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%