Investigating the relationship between breast cancer risk factors and an AI-generated mammographic texture feature in the Nurses' Health Study II
Wu, X.; Jiang, S.; Ge, A.; Turman, C.; Colditz, G. A.; Tamimi, R.; Kraft, P.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe mammogram risk score (MRS), an AI-driven texture feature derived from digital mammograms, strongly predicts breast cancer risk independently of breast density, though underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study investigated relationships between established breast cancer risk factors, covering anthropometrics, reproductive factors, family history, and mammographic density metrics, and MRS. MethodsUsing data from the Nurses Health Study II (292 cases, 561 controls), we validated MRSs association with breast cancer using logistic regression and evaluated its relationships with risk factors through: linear regressions of MRS on observed risk factors and polygenic scores associated with risk factors, and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis via two-stage least squares regression. We conducted two-sample MR of MRS using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies of risk factors. ResultsMRS was significantly associated with breast cancer risk before adjustment for BI-RADS density (OR=1.92 per SD increase in MRS; 95%CI:1.57-2.33; AUC=0.69) and after (OR=1.85; 95%CI:1.49-2.30). Early life body size and adult body mass index (BMI) were inversely associated with MRS, while history of benign breast disease and BI-RADS density showed positive associations; after adjusting for BI-RADS density, associations between MRS and the other three risk factors attenuated. Higher polygenic score for dense area was associated with increased MRS ({beta}=0.16 SD increase in MRS per SD increase in polygenic score; 95%CI: 0.06-0.25), as was percent density ({beta}=0.14; 95%CI:0.05-0.23). Two-sample MR identified associations between genetically predicted dense area ({beta}=0.83 SD increase in MRS per SD increase in dense area; 95%CI:0.39-1.27) and percent density ({beta}=1.14; 95%CI:0.55-1.74) with MRS. After adjusting for BI-RADS density and BMI, higher waist-to-hip ratio was significantly associated with increased MRS in polygenic score and two-sample MR analyses. No significant associations were observed with other risk factors. ConclusionWe validated MRSs association with breast cancer risk in cases diagnosed 0.5-10.1 years (median 2.6) after mammogram acquisition. Our findings reveal robust associations between breast density measures and MRS and suggest a potential impact of central obesity on MRS. Future larger-scale studies are crucial to validate these results and explore their potential to enhance our understanding of breast cancer etiology and refine risk prediction models.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal effects of breast cancer risk factors across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study 97%
- Incorporating alternative Polygenic Risk Scores into the BOADICEA breast cancer risk prediction model 91%
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rho GTPase transcriptional activity and breast cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization analysis 93%
- Increased adiposity is protective for breast and prostate cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study using up to 132,413 breast cancer cases and 85,907 prostate cancer cases. 93%
- Wnt signaling promotes inflammation and EMT-associated gene expression in mesenchymal TNBC 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.