NRGRank: Coarse-grained structurally-informed ultra-massive virtual screening
DesCoteaux, T.; Najmanovich, R.
Show abstract
NRGRank is a coarse-grained structurally-informed virtual screening Python package with accuracy comparable to docking-based methodologies but up to 100-fold speed increase. NRGRank is based on a coarse-grained evaluation of pairwise atom-type pseudo-energy interactions that implicitly accounts for compound and side-chain flexibility as well as limited backbone movements. We compare NRGRank to docking-based virtual screening software Glide, Autodock Vina and DOCK 3.7 on the DUD-E virtual screening benchmark using enrichment factors at 1% (EF1). We observe broad variations of EF1 values across targets, structural models and methods. For apo form or AlphaFold2 models, out of a subset of 37 targets from DUD-E, NRGRank has better EF1 values than Glide for 12 and 13 targets respectively. Even in holo form, where the accuracy of classical docking software increases, NRGRank has better EF1 values than 13, 10 and 5 targets out of 37 compared to AutoDock Vina, DOCK 3.7 and Glide respectively. Comparing the rank of true binders in Glide and NRGRank shows that true binders ranked in the top 1% are complementary between methods irrespective of the target form (AlphaFold, apo or holo). That is, utilizing NRGRank detects binders that are missed by Glide (and presumably other methods), whereas those found by Glide are missed by NRGRank. Furthermore, we observe that most hits found by NRGRank within the top 50 predictions (4.38 {+/-} 5.49 hits on average for AF2 targets) remain once the top 1% of predictions are re-scored with Glide, but the hit rate within the top 50 predictions increases. NRGRank can evaluate one molecule in 0.3 s on average, enabling a modern laptop with 8 cores to screen 1,000,000 molecules in 24 hours - up to two orders of magnitude faster than the reported speed of DOCK 3.7, AutoDock Vina running on GPUs and Glide. NRGRank occupies a unique niche among tools for virtual screening being insensitive to structural inaccuracies but with comparable accuracy as state-of-the-art docking methods and fast as AI-based methods but without the dangers of overfitting as it is based on 780 pseudo-energy parameters. Combined with the fact that NRGRank does not require extensive or expensive computational resources or expert pre-processing of targets, it is unique in making high-performance ultra-massive virtual screening accessible to all.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DENVIS: scalable and high-throughput virtual screening using graph neural networks with atomic and surface protein pocket features 98%
- CANDOCK: Chemical atomic network based hierarchical flexible docking algorithm using generalized statistical potentials 98%
- Are Deep Learning Structural Models Sufficiently Accurate for Free Energy Calculations? Application of FEP+ to AlphaFold2 Predicted Structures 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Thinking like a structural biologist: A pocket-based 3D molecule generative model fueled by electron density 96%
- Exploring the ability of the MD+FoldX method to predict SARS-CoV-2 antibody escape mutations using large-scale data 94%
- Enhanced antibody-antigen structure predictionfrom molecular docking using AlphaFold2 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Generative Design with 3D Pharmacophoric Constraints 97%
- Transfer learning enables discovery of sub-micromolar antibacterials for ESKAPE pathogens from ultra-large chemical spaces 97%
- Structure-Aware Dual-Target Drug Design through Collaborative Learning of Pharmacophore Combination and Molecular Simulation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.