Off-target detection of CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease in vitro with CROFT-Seq
Toliusis, P.; Grybauskas, A.; Sinkunas, T.; Karvelis, T.; Sasnauskas, G.; Zaremba, M.
Show abstract
Programmable CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases have become invaluable tools for genome editing. However, off-target cleavage by these nucleases could lead to unintended changes in the edited genome. Detection of off-target sites is critical to make genome editing technology safe and predictable. Although current in vitro methods for off-target detection can identify these sites, they are time-consuming, complex, and relatively costly. Here, we present CROFT-Seq (CRISPR nuclease off-target detection by sequencing), a sensitive, rapid, and cost-effective assay for the genome-wide detection of Cas9 off-target sites in vitro. CROFT-Seq performs comparably to the common currently used in vitro methods and serves as a valuable and efficient tool for the rapid assessment of genome-editing nuclease specificity. Notably, a high proportion of the top-ranked off-targets identified by CROFT-Seq were validated in cells, highlighting its effectiveness as a predictor of off-target sites.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Branched DNA Processing by a Thermostable CAS-Cas4 from Thermococcus onnurineus: Expanding Biochemical Landscape of Nuclease Activity 94%
- Cas4/1 dual nuclease activities enable prespacer maturation and directional integration in a type I-G CRISPR-Cas system 93%
- Preparation of E. coli RNA polymerase transcription elongation complexes for systematic RNA assays 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction-based highly sensitive CRISPR off-target validation using target-specific DNA enrichment 96%
- Simultaneous inhibition of DNA-PK and Pol{Theta} improves integration efficiency and precision of genome editing 94%
- Predicting base editing outcomes with an attention-based deep learning algorithm trained on high-throughput target library screens 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.