Back

Genome-wide cline analysis identifies new locus contributing to a barrier to gene flow across an Antirrhinum hybrid zone

Field, D. L.; Stankowski, S.; Reiter, T.; Polechova, J.; Bradley, D.; Richardson, D.; Pal, A.; Shipilina, D.; Boell, L.; Pickup, M.; Xue, Y.; Coen, E.; Barton, N. H.

2025-02-20 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.02.17.638607 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Identification of the genomic regions that contribute to reproductive isolation and how they interact is a major goal of evolutionary genetics. Much effort has focused on locating candidate genes and potential barrier loci by scanning genomes for regions of excess differentiation (FST). An alternative, and perhaps more robust approach, would be to scan for genomic regions exhibiting steep clines in allele frequency across a hybrid zone. Here we develop this approach and apply it to genomic data from across a hybrid zone between varieties of Antirrhinum majus subspecies majus with different flower colour patterns (A. m. m var. pseudomajus and A. m. m var. striatum). Most steep clines are clustered in seven genomic regions, only four of which were present from FST scans between all pair-wise comparisons. Six of these regions carry previously identified loci that influence flower colour in the hybrid zone. The seventh region harbours a novel locus, RUBIA, modifying magenta intensity. Clines at RUBIA approached towards fixation on magenta side of the hybrid zone, whilst remaining polymorphic on the yellow side. This polymorphism on the yellow side may reflect a smaller phenotypic effect of RUBIA in yellow compared to magenta genetic backgrounds. Our findings illustrate how whole-genome cline scans in hybrid zones can robustly detect genomic regions contributing to phenotypic differences and highlight how different reproductive barrier loci interact across the genome.

Published in PLOS Genetics (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.