Cefazolin versus Antistaphylococcal Penicillins for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Prosty, C.; Noutsios, D.; Lee, T. C.; Daneman, N.; Davis, J. S.; Jager, N.; Ghanem-Zoubi, N.; Goodman, A. L.; Kaasch, A.; Kouijzer, I.; McMullan, B.; McDonald, E.; Tong, S.; Ong, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundThere is debate on whether cefazolin or antistaphylococcal penicillins should be the first-line treatment for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. Ongoing trials are investigating whether cefazolin is non-inferior to (flu)cloxacillin, but it remains uncertain whether these findings would apply to other antistaphylococcal penicillins. ObjectiveWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cefazolin to each of the individual antistaphylococcal penicillins for MSSA bacteremia. MethodsO_ST_ABSData SourcesC_ST_ABSWe updated a 2019 systematic review but specifically focused on evaluating outcomes by individual antistaphylococcal penicillins. Study Eligibility CriteriaComparative observational studies. ParticipantsPatients with MSSA bacteremia. InterventionsCefazolin versus the antistaphylococcal penicillins. Assessment of Risk of BiasThe risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions tool. Methods of Data SynthesisThe primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, and we assessed for non-inferiority of cefazolin using a prespecified non-inferiority margin of a pooled odds ratio (OR) <1.2. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mortality, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), discontinuation due to toxicity, and nephrotoxicity. ResultsNo randomized data have been published. 30 observational studies at moderate or high risk of bias were included, which comprised 3869 patients who received cefazolin and 11644 patients who received antistaphylococcal penicillins (flucloxacillin=6721, unspecified=2440, nafcillin=1305, cloxacillin=1258, and oxacillin=120). Cefazolin was associated with a reduced odds of 30-day all-cause mortality (OR=0.73, 95%CI=0.62-0.85) compared to antistaphylococcal penicillins, meeting pre-specified non-inferiority as well as superiority. This effect was consistent versus flucloxacillin (OR=0.92, 95%CI=0.73-1.16), nafcillin (OR=0.58, 95%CI=0.28-1.17), cloxacillin (OR=0.42, 95%CI=0.11-1.58), and oxacillin (OR=0.31, 95%CI=0.03-2.75). Point estimates favored cefazolin for 90-day mortality, TRAEs, nephrotoxicity, and discontinuation due to toxicity overall and in each comparison with individual antistaphylococcal penicillins, except for TRAEs versus cloxacillin. ConclusionsIn moderate to low quality observational data, cefazolin was associated with superior effectiveness and safety as compared to antistaphylococcal penicillins overall and individually.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibiotics and hospital-associated Clostridioides difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis 2020 update 95%
- Estimating the cost of antibiotic use on future collateral resistance: a retrospective comparison of cefuroxime versus cefazolin and amoxicillin/clavulanate 94%
- Mortality risks associated with empirical antibiotic activity in E. coli bacteraemia: an analysis of electronic health records 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Serum Concentration of Continuously administered Vancomycin influences Efficacy and Safety in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review 95%
- No one-size-fits-all approach: Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of serum concentrations of continuously administered vancomycin in critically ill adults reveals different target serum concentrations depending on disease severity 93%
- Attitudes to phage therapy among Australian infectious diseases physicians 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A placebo-controlled double blind trial of hydroxychloroquine in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 92%
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of McIsaac and Centor score in patients presenting to secondary care with Pharyngitis 92%
- An open-label randomized, controlled trial of the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus IFN-β-1a and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 – Final results from the DisCoVeRy trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 93%
- COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Outpatient Therapy to Prevent Outpatient Hospitalization: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data From Five Randomized Trials 91%
- Macrolide and non-macrolide resistance after 36 months of mass azithromycin distribution in Burkina Faso: A cluster randomized trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of Bacterial Coinfection and Patterns of Antibiotics Prescribing in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic review and Meta-Analysis 94%
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 93%
- Colchicine use in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.