Scoping review protocol- Scoping review Vitamin B12 deficiency in long term metformin use and clinician awareness
Parsonage, I.; Wainwright, D.; Barratt, J.
Show abstract
IntroductionA relationship between long-term metformin use and vitamin B12 deficiency has been long discussed in literature. Nonetheless, prior to 2022, there was no official guidance. In June 2022, the MHRA published advice, stating that low vitamin B12 is now considered to be a common side effect. It advises checking levels in patients with symptoms of B12 deficiency, as well as monitoring those at risk of B12 deficiency. Despite efforts to promote evidence-based practice, there is still a gap in the translation of research findings into policies and clinical practice. The above research has been shared widely in the academic and specialist Diabetes literature over a prolonged period. The purpose of the scoping review is to explore what evidence is available regarding clinicians awareness of the association between metformin use and vitamin B12 deficiency in patients with T2DM and how this evidence is implemented into frontline clinical practice and what screening processes are recommended or exist? Methods and analysisThis is a protocol for a scoping review to be guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews 20. The databases to be searched will include CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, British Nursing Index, via EBSCOhost. Sources of unpublished studies, policies and grey literature will include Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Open. Titles and abstracts of articles were reviewed by the authors. If articles were representative of the inclusion criteria, the articles went through a full-text review by the authors The results of the search and study inclusion/exclusion process will be reported and presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram. Data will be extracted from papers, using the recommended JBI data extraction tool. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LITo the authors knowledge, this is the first scoping review to look at clinician awareness of Vitamin B12 deficiency in long term metformin use. C_LIO_LIStrengths include an extensive search of multiple databases, including grey literature. C_LIO_LIAs this is a scoping review, the quality of the evidence and risk of bias will not be evaluated. C_LIO_LIThe review is also limited to selected languages which may bias the evidence. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 95%
- Replicating a COVID-19 study in a national England database to assess the generalisability of research with regional electronic health record data 93%
- Determining the feasibility of calculating pancreatic cancer risk scores for people with new-onset diabetes in primary care (DEFEND PRIME): study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Clinical outcomes due to COVID-19. Protocol of a systematic literature review 96%
- Impact of health systems interventions in primary health settings on type 2 diabetes care and health outcomes among adults in West Africa: a systematic review protocol 94%
- The Impact of Clinical Audits on Improving the Effectiveness of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) CARE in Primary Health Centers. A Comprehensive Pre-post analysis through Multi-layered Intervention: The ICAE-DM CARE study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 91%
- Understanding the Challenges of Medicine Optimisation Among Older People From Ethnic Minority Communities (Aged 60 Years and Above) With Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Realist Review Protocol 90%
- Repurposing Existing Medications for Coronavirus Disease 2019: Protocol for a Rapid and Living Systematic Review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Home monitoring of HbA1c in diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and narrative synthesis on reliability, accuracy, and patient acceptability 96%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 89%
- Drug treatments affecting ACE2 in COVID-19 infection: a systematic review protocol 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterisation of type 2 diabetes subgroups and their association with ethnicity and clinical outcomes: a UK real-world data study using the East London Database 91%
- Preconception indicators and associations with health outcomes reported in UK routine primary care data: a systematic review 90%
- Trends and variation in prescribing of suboptimal statin treatment regimes: a cohort study in English primary care 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.