Back

Alterations in the hepatic microenvironment following direct-acting antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C

Millian, D. E.; Arroyave, E.; Wanninger, T. G.; Krishnan, S.; Bao, D. Z.; Zhang, J. R.; Rao, A. Z.; Spratt, H.; Ferguson, M.; Chen, V.; Stevenson, H. L.; Saldarriaga, O. A.

2025-02-18 infectious diseases Community evaluation
10.1101/2025.02.17.25321289 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and aims. The first direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) to treat the viral hepatitis C (HCV) became available in 2011. Despite numerous clinical studies of patient outcomes after treatment, few have evaluated changes in the liver microenvironment. Despite achieving sustained virologic response (SVR), patients may still experience adverse outcomes like cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. By comparing gene and protein expression in liver biopsies collected before and after treatment, we sought to determine whether specific signatures correlated with disease progression and adverse clinical outcomes. Methods. Biopsies were collected from 22 patients before and after DAA treatment. We measured [~]770 genes and used multispectral imaging with custom machine learning algorithms to analyze phenotypes of intrahepatic macrophages (CD68, CD14, CD16, MAC387, CD163) and T cells (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45, FoxP3). Results. Before DAA treatment, patients showed two distinct gene expression patterns: one with high pro-inflammatory and antiviral gene expression and another with weaker expression. Patients with adverse outcomes exhibited significantly (p<0.05) more inflammatory activity and had more advanced fibrosis stages in their baseline biopsies than those with liver disease resolution. Patients who achieved SVR had significantly decreased liver enzymes, reduced inflammatory scores, and restored type 1 interferon pathways similar to controls. However, after DAA treatment, patients with persistently high gene expression (67%, pre-hot) still had significantly worse outcomes (p<0.049) despite achieving SVR. A persistent lymphocytic infiltrate was observed in a subset of these patients (76.5%). After therapy, anti-inflammatory macrophages (CD16+, CD16+CD163+, CD16+CD68+) increased, and T cell heterogeneity was more pronounced, showing a predominance of helper and memory T cells (CD3+CD45RO+, CD4+CD45RO+, CD3+CD4+CD45RO+). Conclusions. Patients who have more inflamed livers and more advanced fibrosis before DAA treatment should be closely followed for the development of adverse outcomes, even after achieving SVR. We can enhance patient risk stratification by integrating gene and protein expression profiles with clinical data. This could identify those who may benefit from more intensive monitoring or alternative therapeutic approaches, inspiring a new era of personalized patient care. Lay SummaryDirect-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has dramatically improved the treatment of chronic HCV, making it curable for most people. This study determined gene and protein expression differences in the liver before and after treatment of HCV. These results will lead to a deeper understanding of the changes in the hepatic immune microenvironment with and without the virus present in the liver in hopes of improving patient surveillance, prognosis, and outcome in the future.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Hepatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
JHEP Reports
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
3
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
7
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
9
Gastroenterology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.8%
11
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Hepatology Communications
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
15
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
16
Med
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
19
Nature Immunology
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
21
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
24
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%