Chemical diversity promotes ecosystem function
Fonvielle, J.; Sandor, S. R.; Dittmar, T.; Tanentzap, A. J.
Show abstract
Nature benefits people in many ways that rely on how microorganisms and abiotic processes interact with organic matter to influence ecosystem function (EF). Despite many studies evaluating how biodiversity affects EF, most variation in EF remains unexplained. Here, we tested how the variety of organic compounds in the environment, termed chemodiversity, influences EF. Using a laboratory experiment and 101-lake survey spanning Europe, we discovered that chemodiversity, not biodiversity, consistently explained variation in multiple functions related to carbon cycling and ecosystem metabolism. We attributed positive chemodiversity-ecosystem multifunctionality relationships to the accumulation of compounds that could be biochemically transformed in more diverse ways at higher chemodiversity. We estimated chemodiversity will decline by 2100 due to changes in organic matter sources, causing European lakes to emit, on average, 1.6-times more carbon. These findings reframe our understanding of ecosystem functioning and suggest chemodiversity is key to sustain the benefits that nature delivers to people.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying microbial associations of dissolved organic matter under global change 98%
- National-scale biogeography and function of river and stream bacterial biofilm communities 96%
- Diverse secondary metabolites are expressed in particle-associated and free-living microorganisms of the permanently anoxic Cariaco Basin 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Stochastic Assembly and Metabolic Network Reorganization Drive Microbial Resilience in Arid Soils 96%
- Landscape heterogeneity and soil biota are central to multi-taxa diversity for landscape restoration 94%
- Continental-scale relationships of fine root and soil carbon stocks hold in grasslands but not forests 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.