Mice dynamically adapt to opponents in competitive multi-player games
Erlich, J. C.; Rastogi, M.; Yin, Q.; Orsolic, I.; Cruz, B. F.; Almeida, A.; Duan, C. A.
Show abstract
Competing for resources in dynamic social environments is fundamental for survival and requires continuous monitoring of both self and others to guide effective choices. Yet most of our understanding of value-based decision-making comes from studying individuals in isolation, leaving open key questions about how animals adapt their strategies during social competition. Here, we developed an ethologically relevant multi-player game in which freely moving mice made valuebased decisions in a competitive spatial foraging task. We found that mice integrated real-time spatial information about both themselves and their opponents to flexibly shift their preferences toward safer, low-payout options when appropriate. Analyses of mice behaviour and reinforcement learning agents revealed that these adaptations could not be explained by simple reward learning, but were instead consistent with optimal decision strategies guided by opponent features. Using a dynamical model of decision-making, we found that competition increased choice variability and sensitivity to initial conditions, generating testable predictions for future neural recordings and perturbations. Together, our findings reveal a fundamental mechanism for flexible competitive foraging and propose novel frameworks for quantitatively understanding value-based decision-making in fast-changing social environments.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Voltage imaging reveals circuit computations in the raphe underlying serotonin-mediated motor vigor learning 97%
- A neural circuit framework for economic choice: from building blocks of valuation to compositionality in multitasking 96%
- Competitive integration of time and reward explains value-sensitive foraging decisions and frontal cortex ramping dynamics 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.