A Multimodal Framework to Uncover Drug-Responsive Subpopulations in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Wang, Y.; Haase, S.; Whitman, A.; Beltran, A.; Spanheimer, P. M.; Brunk, E. C.
Show abstract
Understanding how individual cancer cells adapt to drug treatment is a fundamental challenge limiting precision medicine cancer therapy strategies. While single-cell technologies have advanced our understanding of cellular heterogeneity, efforts to connect the behavior of individual cells to broader tumor drug responses and uncover global trends across diverse systems remain limited. There is a growing availability of single-cell and bulk omics data, but a lack of centralized tools and repositories makes it difficult to study drug response globally, especially at the level of single-cell adaptation. To address this, we present a multimodal framework that integrates bulk and single-cell treated and untreated transcriptomics data to identify drug responsive cell populations in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Our framework leverages population-scale bulk transcriptomics data from TNBC samples to define seven main "identities", each representing unique combinations of biologically relevant genes. These identities are dynamic and trackable, allowing us to map them onto single cells and uncover global patterns of how cell populations respond to drug treatment. Unlike static classifications, this approach captures the evolving nature of cellular states, revealing that a select few identities dominate and drive population-level responses during treatment. Crucially, our ability to decode these trends through the inherent noise of single-cell data provides a clearer picture of how heterogeneous cell populations adapt to therapy. By identifying the dominant identities and their dynamics, we can better predict how entire tumors respond to treatment. This insight is essential for designing precise combination therapies tailored to the unique heterogeneity of patient tumors, addressing the single-cell variations that ultimately determine therapeutic outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplexed single-cell profiling of post-perturbation transcriptional responses to define cancer vulnerabilities and therapeutic mechanism of action 98%
- Reconstructing disease dynamics for mechanistic insights and clinical benefit 97%
- YAP-Driven Oral Epithelial Stem Cell Malignant Reprogramming at Single Cell Resolution 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative, high-resolution analysis of single cell gene expression across experimental conditions with PARAFAC2-RISE 96%
- Multiome Perturb-seq unlocks scalable discovery of integrated perturbation effects on the transcriptome and epigenome 95%
- Widespread transcriptional memory shapes heritable states and functional heterogeneity in cancer and stem cells 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- 1-Methylnicotinamide is an immune regulatory metabolite in human ovarian cancer 97%
- Conditional lethality profiling reveals anticancer mechanisms of action and drug-nutrient interactions 96%
- Chromatin arranges in chains of mesoscale domains with nanoscale functional topography independent of cohesin 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.