Back

Database Chemistry for Genomics-Based Safety and Quality Evaluation of Biologics

Ogata, N.; Matsuda, T.; Hosaka, A.; Shina, A.; Hashiba, N.; Uchida, K.; Kawabe, Y.; Kamihira, M.; Yamaoka, T.; Kunita, H.; Yamano-Adachi, N.; Omasa, T.

2025-02-17 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.02.14.638017 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genomics-based safety and quality evaluation studies are advancing the bioindustry by enhancing various aspects, including viral safety, host cell protein (HCP) control, product heterogeneity control, cellular heterogeneity control, and process reproducibility. High-throughput instruments and genome-scale databases are essential in genomics, with the reference genome sequence being the most critical database. The completeness and accuracy of these genome sequences depend on DNA quality, sequencing instruments, read coverage, and assembly strategies. Significant efforts are being made to perfect genome assembly and continuously improve it. However, the quantitative impact of reference genome sequence accuracy on the safety of biologics is not yet fully understood. In this study, we compared and benchmarked six Chinese hamster genomes, including four newly sequenced genomes derived from Chinese hamster cell lines, from an industrial perspective. We also developed database assembly techniques to enhance the safety of biologics. We recommend using two or more independent reference genomes for viral safety studies. For HCP control, we suggest using protein sequences in which trypsin degradation peptides that overlap with high-risk proteins should be masked and unified. Additionally, we can predict microenvironments using single-cell transcriptome data. In bioengineering processes, any nucleotide samples have potential commercial benefits.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.9%
2
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Metabolic Engineering
75 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
8
Journal of Advanced Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
12
Biotechnology Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
13
Experimental Eye Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
14
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
15
Journal of Biotechnology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.1%
18
Science China Life Sciences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Virology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
Neuroscience Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
24
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
26
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
27
BioTechniques
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Journal of Extracellular Biology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
30
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%