Dynamic and Biphasic Regulation of Cell Migration by Ras
Lin, Y.; Parajon, E.; Yuan, Q.; Ye, S.; Qin, G.; Deng, Y.; Borleis, J.; Koyfman, A.; Iglesias, P. A.; Konstantopoulos, K.; Robinson, D. N.; Devreotes, P. N.
Show abstract
Ras has traditionally been regarded as a positive regulator and therapeutic target due to its role in cell proliferation, but recent findings indicate a more nuanced role in cell migration, where suppressed Ras activity can unexpectedly promote migration. To clarify this complexity, we systematically modulate Ras activity using various RasGEF and RasGAP proteins and assess their effects on migration dynamics. Leveraging optogenetics, we assess the immediate, non-transcriptional effects of Ras signaling on migration. Local RasGEF recruitment to the plasma membrane induces protrusions and new fronts to effectively guide migration, even in the absence of GPCR/G-protein signaling whereas global recruitment causes immediate cell spreading halting cell migration. Local RasGAP recruitment suppresses protrusions, generates new backs, and repels cells whereas global relocation either eliminates all protrusions to inhibit migration or preserves a single protrusion to maintain polarity. Consistent local and global increases or decreases in signal transduction and cytoskeletal activities accompany these morphological changes. Additionally, we performed cortical tension measurements and found that RasGEFs generally increase cortical tension while RasGAPs decrease it. Our results reveal a biphasic relationship between Ras activity and cellular dynamics, reinforcing our previous findings that optimal Ras activity and cortical tension are critical for efficient migration. SignificanceThis study challenges the traditional view of Ras as solely a positive regulator of cell functions by controlling of gene expression. Using optogenetics to rapidly modulate Ras activity in Dictyostelium, we demonstrate a biphasic relationship between Ras activity and migration: both excessive and insufficient Ras activity impair cell movement. Importantly, these effects occur rapidly, independent of transcriptional changes, revealing the mechanism by which Ras controls cell migration. The findings suggest that optimal Ras activity and cortical tension are crucial for efficient migration, and that targeting Ras in cancer therapy should consider the cells initial state, aiming to push Ras activity outside the optimal range for migration. This nuanced understanding of the role of Ras in migration has significant implications for developing more effective cancer treatments, as simply inhibiting Ras might inadvertently promote metastasis in certain contexts.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Complementary Cytoskeletal Feedback Loops Control Signal Transduction Excitability and Cell Polarity 97%
- Directional reorientation of migrating neutrophils is limited by suppression of receptor input signaling at the cell rear through myosin II activity 97%
- Optogenetic control of receptors reveals distinct roles for actin- and Cdc42-dependent negative signals in chemotactic signal processing 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- ADF and cofilin-1 collaborate to promote cortical actin flow and the leader bleb-based migration of confined cells 96%
- Hundreds of myosin 10s are pushed to the tips of filopodia and could cause traffic jams on actin 96%
- Optogenetic control of a GEF of RhoA uncovers a signaling switch from retraction to protrusion 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- An E-cadherin-actin clutch translates the mechanical force of cortical flow for cell-cell contact to inhibit epithelial cell locomotion 96%
- LIMD1 phase separation contributes to cellular mechanics and durotaxis by regulating focal adhesion dynamics in response to force 95%
- Direct activation of the Ras-Akt network mediates polarity and organizes protrusions in human neutrophil migration 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.