Back

Deciphering population-level response under spatial drug heterogeneity on microhabitat structures

Hu, Z.; Wood, K. B.

2025-02-17 biophysics
10.1101/2025.02.13.638200 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacteria and cancer cells inhabit spatially heterogeneous environments, where migration shapes microhabitat structures critical for colonization and metastasis. The interplay between growth, migration, and spatial structure complicates the prediction of population responses to drug treatment--such as clearance or persistence--even under the same spatially averaged growth rate. Accurately predicting these responses is essential for designing effective treatment strategies. Here, we propose a minimal growth-migration model to study population dynamics on discrete microhabitat structures under spatial drug heterogeneity. By applying a kernel transformation, we map the original structure to an effective fully connected graph and derive a new exact criterion for population response based on a regularized Laplacian kernel reweighted by local growth rates. This criterion connects to forest closeness centrality and yields analytical bounds and sufficient conditions for population growth or decline. We find that higher structural connectivity--like increased migration--generally promotes decline. Our framework also informs optimal spatial drug assignments, which reduce to selecting interconnected subcores in the effective complete graph. For partially controllable microhabitats or unknown drug distributions, we identify strategies that ensure population decline. Overall, our results offer a new theoretical perspective on drug response in spatially structured populations and provide practical guidance for optimizing spatially explicit dosing strategies in heterogeneous environments.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.5%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.2%
3
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.2%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.2%
6
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
7
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
9
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
11
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.1%
12
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
15
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
17
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
20
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
28
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%