Synthetic communities as a model for determining interactions between a biofertilizer chassis organism and native microbial consortia
Madsen, C. S.; Kimbrel, J. A.; Diep, P.; Ricci, D. P.
Show abstract
Biofertilizers are critical for sustainable agriculture since they can replace ecologically disruptive chemical fertilizers while improving the trajectory of soil and plant health. Yet, to continue improving deployment, the persistence of designer biofertilizers within native soil consortia must be elucidated and enhanced. Here, we describe a high-throughput, modular, and automation-friendly in vitro approach to screen for biofertilizer organism persistence within soil-derived consortia after co-cultivation with stable synthetic soil microbial communities (SynComs) obtained through a top-down cultivation process. We profiled [~]1200 SynComs isolated from various soil sources and cultivated in divergent media types, and detected significant phylogenetic diversity (e.g., Shannon index > 4) and richness (Observed richness > 400) across these communities. We observed high reproducibility in SynCom community structure from common soil and media types, which provided a testbed for assessing biofertilizer persistence within representative native consortia. Furthermore, we demonstrate the screening method described herein can be coupled with microbial engineering to efficiently identify soil-derived SynComs where an engineered biofertilizer organism (i.e. Bacillus subtilis) persists. Additionally, our approach enables an analysis of the ecological impact of B. subtilis inoculation on SynCom structure and profile alterations in community diversity and richness (or lack thereof) associated with the presence of a genetically modified model bacterium. Ultimately, this work establishes a modular pipeline that could be integrated into a variety of microbiology/microbiome-relevant workflows or related applications that would benefit from assessing persistence and interaction of a specific organism of interest with native consortia.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A reproducible and tunable synthetic soil microbial community provides new insights into microbial ecology 97%
- Long-term cellulose enrichment selects for highly cellulolytic consortia and competition for public goods 95%
- Metabolic network construction reveals probiotic-specific alterations in the metabolic activity of a synthetic small intestinal community 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- TbasCO: Trait-based Comparative 'Omics Identifies Ecosystem-Level and Niche-Differentiating Adaptations of an Engineered Microbiome 95%
- Identifying and tracking mobile elements in evolving compost communities yields insights into the nanobiome 95%
- pH selects for distinct N2O-reducing microbiomes in tropical soil microcosms 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- High-throughput single-cell isolation of Bifidobacterium strains from the gut microbiome 94%
- Activation dynamics and assembly of root zone soil bacterial communities in response to stress-associated phytohormones 94%
- Diversity in Chemical Subunits and Linkages: A Key Molecular Determinant of Microbial Richness, Microbiota Interactions, and Substrate Utilization 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deterministic colonization arises early during the transition of soil bacteria to the phyllosphere and is shaped by plant-microbe interactions. 95%
- Increased Replication Rates of Dissimilatory Nitrogen-Reducing Bacteria Leads to Decreased Anammox Reactor Performance 94%
- Specific and conserved patterns of microbiota-structuring by maize benzoxazinoids in the field 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring the interaction network of a synthetic gut bacterial community 95%
- Soil microbial community response to corrinoids is shaped by a natural reservoir of vitamin B12. 95%
- Copiotrophs dominate rhizosphere microbiomes and growth rate potential is a major factor explaining the rhizosphere effect 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.