Maintaining tandem movement cohesion through antennal movements in termites
Mizumoto, N.; Reiter, S.
Show abstract
How do animals coordinate their motion during migration? Traditional models of collective motion, for example, describing bird flocks or fish schools, rely on visual interactions. However, many animals are blind, requiring movement coordination through maintenance of physical contact. The risks and cost of becoming accidentally separated may encourage the evolution of compensatory strategies. Here we study tandem running in blind termites. We quantitatively investigate how these animals use their appendages to maintain stable pair movements. During tandem runs, male followers use shorter palps and longer antennae to maintain physical contact with female leaders. Our posture-tracking analysis revealed that termites dynamically change their antennal movements. Males stabilize their antennae to maintain contact with their partners while their palps are in contact. When the male palps lost contact with a female, males started swinging antennae while increasing movement speed. Antennae removal experiments revealed that antennal swinging contributes to pair maintenance, and males compensate for single antenna loss by increasing the swinging of the remaining one. By providing detailed information on contact-based movement coordination, our results contribute to understanding the diversity of animal collective behavior.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Wasted efforts impair random search efficiency and reduce choosiness in mate-pairing termites 96%
- Parameter tuning facilitates the evolution of diverse tunneling patterns in termites 95%
- Genetic and phenotypic consequences of local transitions between sexual and parthenogenetic reproduction in the wild 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.