Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reduces Non-Decision Time in Perceptual Decisions
Gordleeva, S.; Maksimenko, V.; Mohammad, U.; Grigoriev, N.; Savosenkov, A.; Kuc, A.; Kurkin, S.; Udoratina, A.; Grubov, V.; Hramov, A.
Show abstract
Perceptual decision-making enables humans to process sensory information and translate it into goal-directed actions. A critical component of this process is response time, which declines with age due to the slowing of both non-decision processes and evidence accumulation. While perceptual learning has been shown to counteract these declines, it remains unclear whether non-decision processes can be accelerated through direct neural stimulation, bypassing the need for long training sessions. Here, we propose that Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) can enhance perceptual decision-making by specifically reducing non-decision time. To test this hypothesis, we tracked response times during a perceptual learning task while recording brain activity. Using the Drift Diffusion Model, we quantified the effects of TMS on mental speed and non-decision time. Our findings reveal that perceptual learning decreases response time by simultaneously increasing mental speed and reducing non-decision time. Crucially, TMS application to brain regions associated with perceptual learning further shortened non-decision time without altering mental speed. These results demonstrate that TMS can selectively accelerate non-decision processes, offering a promising intervention for mitigating age-related cognitive slowing and enhancing decision efficiency. Significance StatementPerceptual decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that slows with age due to declines in both non-decision processes and mental speed. While perceptual learning can mitigate these declines through practice, we propose that non-decision time can also be reduced by directly stimulating neural ensembles using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). Our study demonstrates that TMS applied to task-relevant brain areas decreases non-decision time, thereby accelerating response speed without affecting mental speed. These findings reveal a novel mechanism for enhancing perceptual decision-making efficiency and highlight TMS as a potential tool for counteracting age-related cognitive slowing.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of alpha oscillations in a premotor-cerebellar loop in modulation of motor learning: insights from transcranial alternating current stimulation 96%
- Recognizing EEG responses to active TMS vs. sham stimulations in different TMS-EEG datasets: a machine learning approach 96%
- Mapping Cognitive Brain Functions at Scale 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.