Nano-organization of synapses defines synaptic release properties at cortical neuron dendritic spines
Jafri, H.; Thomas, S. J.; Yang, S. H.; Cain, R. E.; Dalva, M. B.
Show abstract
Visualization of the submicron organization of excitatory synapses has revealed an unexpectedly ordered architecture consisting of nanocolumns of synaptic proteins that group into nanomodules which scale in number as spine size increases. How these features are related to synaptic function has remained unclear. Here, using super-resolution followed by live-cell line-scan imaging, we find that the size of the smallest miniature calcium and glutamate events are the same, regardless of whether spines have one or two nanopuncta of PSD-95, and that miniature synaptic response in all spines are best fit by a three term Poisson. Two nanomodule spines exhibit more large events without a significant change in event frequency, with the number of the largest events increasing disproportionately. These data support a model where nanomodules define sites of synaptic release and where the nanoarchitecture of synaptic proteins specifies subtypes of excitatory synapses, with increasing numbers of nanomodules increasing coordinated multivesicular release.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Stable but not rigid: Long-term in vivo STED nanoscopy uncovers extensive remodeling of stable spines and indicates multiple drivers of structural plasticity 96%
- Sodium channel endocytosis drives axon initial segment plasticity 95%
- The Spatial Scale of Synaptic Protein Allocation during Homeostatic Plasticity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolic Regulation of Single Synaptic Vesicle Exo- and Endocytosis in Hippocampal Synapses 96%
- CTNND2 regulation by the SRGAP2 protein family links human evolution to synaptic neoteny 95%
- Human NMDAR autoantibodies disrupt excitatory-inhibitory balance leading to hippocampal network hypersynchrony 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.