Back

Prevalence, Risk Factors, Hesitancy, and Attitudes Toward Vaccination Against Reproductive Tract Infections Among Women in an Urban Setting: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Yadav, S. K.; Bhardwaj, P.; Kant, R.; Ghosh, J.; Mangla, A. G.; Muralidhar, S.; Saluja, D.; Singh, R.; Sikora, A. E.; Taneja, J.

2025-02-14 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.02.13.25322217 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundReproductive tract infections (RTIs) including sexually transmitted infections (STIs), endogenous and iatrogenic infections are a major health concern globally, particularly among young women in developing nations. If untreated, they can lead to infertility, increased HIV susceptibility, and cervical cancer. This study examines RTI symptoms prevalence, risk factors, and hesitancy toward STI vaccination. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,920 urban women (predominantly aged 18-25) in Delhi/NCR using a structured questionnaire. Data on demographics, reproductive health, RTI symptoms, and vaccine awareness were analyzed using SPSS 20. Chi-square tests, Fishers exact tests, and Bonferroni corrections were applied, with multinomial logistic regression identifying RTI risk predictors. ResultsAmong respondents, 1,240 (64.6%) reported RTI symptoms, with 1,029 (83%) experiencing vaginal discharge and 974 (78.5%) vulval itching. Significant risk factors included early menarche, irregular menstrual cycles, poor menstrual hygiene, and prior RTI medication use. Additionally, 1,033 (53.8%) were hesitant about STI vaccination, citing safety concerns (36%, 372) and cost (18.6%, 192). However, 826 (43%) reported that healthcare provider recommendations positively influenced their decision to vaccinate. ConclusionThe high prevalence of RTI symptoms highlights the urgent need for improved awareness, accessible healthcare services, and stronger vaccination promotion efforts to enhance RTI prevention and management.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.