STHLM3-F/U Study Protocol: Long-Term Effects on Prostate Cancer Mortality after the Stockholm3 Prostate Cancer Screening Trial (STHLM3)
Micoli, C.; Discacciati, A.; Eklund, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is the leading cause of cancer death among men in Sweden. Although PSA (prostate-specific antigen) testing to screen for prostate cancer is common, its use remains controversial. This debate is primarily fueled by its insufficient operating characteristics, resulting in many benign biopsies and overdiagnosis of indolent disease. The population-based diagnostic STHLM3 trial developed and validated the Stockholm3 test, demonstrating that the combined use of PSA and Stockholm3 can identify clinically significant PCa with higher specificity while retaining the same sensitivity as PSA alone. However, the long-term implications of screening with the combined use of PSA and Stockholm3 on mortality remain unknown. AimThis study aims to evaluate the effect of a one-time invitation for prostate cancer screening (using PSA and Stockholm3 test in combination) in men aged 50-69 living in Stockholm on prostate cancer mortality and all-cause mortality, as well as its effects on prostate cancer incidence, PSA testing, and biopsy rates. The research question investigated in this study (STHLM3-F/U) concerns one of the pre-specified secondary outcomes of the original population-based diagnostic STHLM3 study (ISRCTN84445406). Randomization and InterventionThe trial involves men aged 50 to 69 living in Stockholm at the moment of invitation and who did not have a prostate cancer diagnosis. Randomization occurred at the population level using registry-based information, eligible men were randomly assigned to receive an invitation for screening or to continue with standard care. Invited men who decided to participate in the STHLM3 trial took a PSA test, followed by the Stockholm3 test if PSA level was above 1 ng/mL. Systematic biopsy was recommended for those with PSA [≥] 3 ng/mL and/or a Stockholm3 score [≥] 10%. The non-invited group did not receive any invitations and relied on standard care. Outcomes and analysisPrimary outcome was prostate cancer mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, prostate cancer incidence, PSA testing, and biopsy rates. Data will be analyzed using registry information, with primary analysis using follow-up data until 2023-12-31. Time to prostate cancer mortality will be analyzed using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. Cumulative risks at the end of the follow-up will be compared between the invited and non-invited groups by means of a Risk Ratio at an alpha level of 3.5%. Both intention-to-screen and compliance-adjusted analyses will be performed. DiscussionThis study aims to address the knowledge gap regarding the long-term effect of screening with PSA and Stockholm3 tests in combination and provide insights into its potential effects on preventing mortality. Understanding whether a systematic organized screening intervention, using a combination of PSA and Stockholm3 has any effect on mortality can help inform decisions on prostate cancer screening policies. Ethics and disseminationApproval for ethical conduct has been obtained from the Stockholm regional ethics committee. Results will be shared through peer-reviewed publications.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the randomized trial of early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (ProScreen) 97%
- Retrospective Validation of an Artificial Intelligence System for Diagnostic Assessment of Prostate Biopsies on the ProMort Cohort: Study Protocol 90%
- Psychological Impact of the Galleri Test (sIG(n)al): Protocol for a longitudinal evaluation of the psychological impact of receiving a cancer signal in the NHS-Galleri Trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applying a genetic risk score for prostate cancer to men with lower urinary tract symptoms in primary care to predict prostate cancer diagnosis: a cohort study in the UK Biobank 94%
- Peroxisomal β-oxidation enzyme, DECR2, regulates lipid metabolism and promotes treatment resistance in advanced prostate cancer 89%
- Immortal time bias in older vs younger age groups: a simulation study with application to a population-based cohort of patients with colon cancer 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a Multi-ancestry Polygenic Risk Score and Age-Specific Risks of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis Within Diverse Populations 91%
- Extent, impact, and mitigation of batch effects in tumor biomarker studies using tissue microarrays 90%
- Clinical benefits and adverse effects of genetically-elevated free testosterone levels: a Mendelian randomization analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate prognosis for localized prostate cancer through coherent voting networks and multi-omic data 94%
- CD117/c-kit Represents a Prostate Cancer Stem-Like Subpopulation Driving Progression, Migration, and TKI Resistance 89%
- PathProfiler: Automated Quality Assessment of Retrospective Histopathology Whole-Slide Image Cohorts by Artificial Intelligence, A Case Study for Prostate Cancer Research 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of the rs1042522 SNP with prostate cancer risk: a study of cancer tissues, primary tumor cultures and serum samples from a European Caucasian population 90%
- 5hmC-profiles in Puerto Rican Hispanic/Latino men with aggressive prostate cancer 89%
- The expression of PKM1 and PKM2 in developing, benign, and cancerous prostatic tissues 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.