Back

Probing the zooarchaeological record across time and space for ancient pathogens

Runge, A. K. W.; Light-Maka, I.; Massy, K.; Keller, M.; Trixl, S.; Kabral, H.; Kirkpatrick, C. L.; Bos, K.; Eger, J.; Ernee, M.; Kysely, R.; Hochmuth, M.; Poradowski, D.; Chroszcz, A.; Benecke, N.; Danecek, D.; Klementova, J.; Nagler, A.; Kalmykov, A. A.; Kantorovich, A. R.; Maslov, V. E.; Belinskiy, A. B.; Scheib, C. L.; Toderas, M.; Hansen, S.; Stockhammer, P. W.; Kaniuth, K.; Uhl, R.; Reinhold, S.; Gillis, R. E.; Nelson, E. A.; Pawlowska, K.; Key, F. M.

2025-02-13 microbiology
10.1101/2025.02.12.637901 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Zoonoses are among the greatest threats to human health, with many zoonotic pathogens believed to have emerged during prehistory. Palaeomicrobiological investigations of the zooarchaeological record hold potential to uncover the reservoirs, host ranges, and host adaptations of zoonotic pathogens but face challenges in identifying promising specimens and pathogen DNA preservation. We performed palaeopathological and genetic examinations of 346 skeletal elements from domesticated and wild animals collected from 34 Eurasian sites dating across the last six millennia. We identified 68 signatures of ancient (opportunistic) pathogens, including the important zoonotic pathogen Salmonella enterica, and found support that palaeopathological lesions provide guidance for specimen selection. For two pathogen species, Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae and Streptococcus lutetiensis, we confirmed their ancient authenticity using phylogenetics, showcasing an approach to explore the relationship between ancient low-coverage genomes and their modern-day relatives. Our work presents a pathway to understanding prehistoric zoonotic diseases by integrating zooarchaeological, palaeopathological, and genetic data.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.