Back

Comparative pangenome and mobilome analysis of clostridial species clusters reveals different levels of host adaptation and novel conserved biosynthetic potential

De Vrieze, L.; Aerts, J.; Masschelein, J.

2025-02-16 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.02.12.637840 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To thrive in diverse ecological niches, bacteria adopt various lifestyles, that range from living freely in the soil to forming close associations with human and animal hosts. However, the impact of these adaptation processes on their genomes and metabolisms remains largely unexplored beyond the genus level. Investigating these evolutionary dynamics at higher taxonomic levels can enhance our understanding of the relationship between host adaptation and their functional capabilities. Here, we examine the evolutionary trajectories and metabolic capabilities of the Clostridia class, which displays a variety of lifestyles and is of high importance for industry, medicine and microbiome research. First, we uncover that the clostridial orders have significantly different adaptation rates. Second, we show that the Oscillospirales order has undergone extensive genomic and functional specialisation toward a host-associated lifestyle, while the Lachnospirales order tends to be at a lower level of host association, retaining a remarkably high number of free-living trait genes and a high degree of metabolic versatility. Third, we reveal substantial differences in genomic architecture and metabolic versatility between the clostridial orders and link these to the progressing stages of host adaptation. Additionally, we identify widely conserved biosynthetic gene clusters, highlighting untapped biosynthetic potential of evolutionary significance. Hence, the beyond-genus level analyses in this study provide valuable new insights into bacterial adaptation with broad implications for evolutionary biology, microbiome research and biotechnology.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.