Back

A Clinically Aligned Murine Model of Electroconvulsive Stimulation Reverses Social Aversion and Displays Fear Memory Impairment After Chronic Social Defeat Stress

Kritzer, M. D.; Maddox, S.; Chen, M. X.; Dan, S.; Covington, H.; Miczek, K. A.; Camprodon, J. A.; Klengel, T.; Ressler, K. J.

2025-02-14 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.02.12.637719 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment for patients with major depression, bipolar depression, mania, catatonia, and schizophrenia. Nonetheless, the mechanisms underlying its therapeutic effects largely remain unknown. While previous preclinical studies have noted a role for neurotropic signaling, neurogenesis, and alterations in monoamine neurotransmitter systems, these models were largely conducted using procedures that deviate from clinical practice. Therefore, we sought to develop a clinically relevant murine model of ECT, referred to as electroconvulsive stimulation (ECS) in animals, which more closely aligns with current clinical approaches to better explore its mechanisms. Using the well-established chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) paradigm, known to negatively impact reward processes, we investigated whether the behavioral changes after CSDS could be reversed following a clinically related course of ECS. Additionally, we observed induction of plasticity-related genes in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) and amygdala, regions responsible for reward and fear-related memory, respectively. Lastly, we investigated ECS-related changes in the NAcc with bulk RNA-sequencing. Pathway analysis demonstrated cellular changes primarily involved in neuroplasticity and regulating cell migration and differentiation. Therefore, utilizing our novel and clinically relevant model of ECS, we have begun to elucidate mechanisms that contribute to ECTs therapeutic outcomes by examining murine behavior and RNA from brain regions associated with stress-induced states that model anxiety and depression and the effects of ECS.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.