Efficacy of optimized multichannel vs conventional tDCS for clinical use in major depression: a randomized controlled trial
Salehinejad, M. A.; Abdi, M.; Dadashi, M.; Hallajian, A.-H.; Sharifi, K.; Khadem, A.; Salvador, R.; Ruffini, G.; Nitsche, M. A.
Show abstract
Application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been increased in neuropsychiatric disorders, especially depression, in the last decade. Despite promising results, the clinical efficacy of tDCS is still under debate and researchers and clinicians try to maximize efficacy by developing optimized/individualized protocols. In this randomized sham-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial, we optimized a stimulation protocol for increasing and decreasing activity in the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Sixty patients with unipolar depression received 30 sessions of conventional, optimized multichannel, or sham tDCS in parallel groups. In the multichannel optimized tDCS, electrical current was delivered via 7 small electrodes while in the conventional and sham tDCS large anodal and cathodal electrodes were used. Intervention efficacy and treatment response were evaluated before treatment and after the 10th, 20th, 30th sessions, and 1- and 3-months post-intervention. Cognitive functions and brain connectivity were also assessed. Compared to the sham group, both active tDCS groups significantly reduced depressive symptoms up to 3 months following the intervention, and the therapeutic effects were observed from session 10th only in the multichannel tDCS groups. Furthermore, the effect size from the optimized multichannel protocol was significantly larger than the conventional tDCS. These data suggest that optimized multichannel tDCS might maximize therapeutic efficacy in major depression.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intensified stimulation targeting lateral and medial prefrontal cortices for the treatment of social anxiety disorder: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-comparison study 96%
- Transferability of cathodal tDCS effects from the primary motor to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a multimodal TMS-EEG study 96%
- Intensity-dependent effects of tDCS on motor learning are related to dopamine 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Targeting the Default Mode Network for the Treatment of Depression 94%
- Ketamine and attentional bias to threat: dynamic causal modeling of magnetoencephalographic connectivity in treatment-resistant depression 94%
- Altered EEG resting-state large-scale brain network dynamics in euthymic bipolar disorder patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unilateral and Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Follow up on a Naturalistic Observation Study 95%
- Bilateral Sequential Theta Burst Stimulation for Multiple-Therapy-ResistantDepression: a naturalistic observation study 94%
- Transient frontal spectral events from EEG predict antidepressant response to sertraline in depression 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-trial prediction of treatment response to transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with major depressive disorder 95%
- Medial prefrontal transcranial alternating current stimulation for apathy in Huntington’s disease 95%
- Cortical excitation-inhibition ratio mediates the effect of pre-attentive auditory processing deficits on interpersonal difficulties 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced network synchronization connectivity following transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in bipolar depression: effects on EEG oscillations and deep learning-based predictors of clinical remission 98%
- Effects of bilateral sequential theta-burst stimulation on functional connectivity in treatment-resistant depression: first results 95%
- The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current and Magnetic Stimulation on Fear Extinction and Return of Fear: A meta-analysis and Systematic Review 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.