Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activation and mental health: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study
Yang, G.; Burgess, S.; Schooling, C. M.
Show abstract
Concerns have been raised about the psychiatric safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists, but trial evidence suggests that they ameliorate depressive symptoms. We aimed to assess the associations of GLP-1R activation with mental health well-being and the risk of mental health disorders and substance use disorders. We performed drug-target Mendelian randomization and colocalization analyses using the largest relevant genome-wide association studies and replicated in FinnGen. After correcting for multiple comparisons, genetically predicted lower body mass index (BMI) via GLP-1R activation was associated with a better well-being spectrum (0.06 standard deviation [95% confidence interval 0.03-0.08]), lower risk of depression (odds ratio 0.83 [0.74-0.94]), and lower risk of bipolar disorder (odds ratio 0.61 [0.47-0.79]) per 1-kg/m2 decrease in BMI. There was also suggestive evidence that genetically predicted lower BMI via GLP-1R activation was associated with lower risk of substance use disorders. These associations were stronger than the associations for genetically predicted lower BMI and lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) based on genome-wide variants. The posterior probabilities of colocalization of BMI and each outcome at the GLP1R gene were 59.3% for the well-being spectrum, 3.8% for depression, and 45.9% for bipolar disorder. However, the posterior probabilities of colocalization were > 80% for the well-being spectrum and bipolar disorder when conditioning on the presence of a variant associated with the outcome. This study provides genetic evidence that GLP-1R activation is associated with better mental health well-being and lower risk of bipolar disorder, possibly beyond its effect on BMI and HbA1c.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional and molecular characterization of suicidality factors using phenotypic and genome-wide data 94%
- Leveraging genome-wide data to investigate differences between opioid use vs. opioid dependence in 41,176 individuals from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium 94%
- Genetic heterogeneity and subtypes of major depression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Neural Correlates and Common Biological Mechanisms of Psychopathology Spectra 95%
- Integrating HiTOP and RDoC Frameworks Part II: Shared and Distinct Biological Mechanisms of Externalizing and Internalizing Psychopathology 93%
- Evidence of shared genetic influences underlying schizophrenia and alcohol use disorder, but not alcohol consumption 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence, Comorbidity, and Sociodemographic Correlates of Psychiatric Disorders in the All Of Us Biobank 92%
- Effect of everyday discrimination on depression and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a large-scale, repeated-measures study in the All of Us Research Program 91%
- Evidence for a serotonergic subtype of major depressive disorder: A NeuroPharm-1 study. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinguishing clinical and genetic risk factors for suicidal ideation and behavior in a diverse hospital population 94%
- Are psychiatric disorders risk factors for COVID-19 susceptibility and severity? a two-sample, bidirectional, univariable and multivariable Mendelian Randomization study 94%
- Differential and spatial expression meta-analysis of genes identified in genome-wide association studies of depression 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The genetics of the mood disorder spectrum: genome-wide association analyses of over 185,000 cases and 439,000 controls 93%
- Novel insights into the common heritable liability to addiction: a multivariate genome-wide association study 92%
- GWAS of Over 427,000 Individuals Establishes GABAergic and Synaptic Molecular Pathways as Key for Cognitive Executive Functions 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.