Back

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activation and mental health: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study

Yang, G.; Burgess, S.; Schooling, C. M.

2025-02-13 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.02.12.25322150 medRxiv
Show abstract

Concerns have been raised about the psychiatric safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists, but trial evidence suggests that they ameliorate depressive symptoms. We aimed to assess the associations of GLP-1R activation with mental health well-being and the risk of mental health disorders and substance use disorders. We performed drug-target Mendelian randomization and colocalization analyses using the largest relevant genome-wide association studies and replicated in FinnGen. After correcting for multiple comparisons, genetically predicted lower body mass index (BMI) via GLP-1R activation was associated with a better well-being spectrum (0.06 standard deviation [95% confidence interval 0.03-0.08]), lower risk of depression (odds ratio 0.83 [0.74-0.94]), and lower risk of bipolar disorder (odds ratio 0.61 [0.47-0.79]) per 1-kg/m2 decrease in BMI. There was also suggestive evidence that genetically predicted lower BMI via GLP-1R activation was associated with lower risk of substance use disorders. These associations were stronger than the associations for genetically predicted lower BMI and lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) based on genome-wide variants. The posterior probabilities of colocalization of BMI and each outcome at the GLP1R gene were 59.3% for the well-being spectrum, 3.8% for depression, and 45.9% for bipolar disorder. However, the posterior probabilities of colocalization were > 80% for the well-being spectrum and bipolar disorder when conditioning on the presence of a variant associated with the outcome. This study provides genetic evidence that GLP-1R activation is associated with better mental health well-being and lower risk of bipolar disorder, possibly beyond its effect on BMI and HbA1c.

Published in Translational Psychiatry (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.