Exploring the causal role of the human gut microbiome in breast cancer risk
Edmunds, G. L.; Robinson, T.; Yarmolinsky, J.; Lee, M. A.; Hayes, B.; Hughes, D. A.; Gibbs, L.; Braybrooke, J. P.; Raes, J.; Timpson, N. J.; Wade, K. H.
Show abstract
The relationship between the human gut microbiome and breast cancer (BC) risk is uncertain. We used Mendelian randomization (MR) and multivariable linear regression to investigate the causal relationship between the human gut microbiome and BC risk (overall and subtype-specific) and interrogate the role of circulating metabolites as potential mediators. Summary-level data from genome-wide association studies of gut microbial traits (N=3,890), circulating metabolites (N=7,824), overall (N=247,175) and subtype-specific (N=200,898) BC risk, including triple negative BC (TNBC; N=120,493), alongside individual-level data from the Flemish Gut Flora Project (N=2,242). Sensitivity analyses were applied to examine the robustness of causal estimates. Initial two-sample MR analyses suggested that the presence of bacteria within the Ruminococcus genus increased overall BC risk, that higher abundances of bacteria within the Parabacteroides genus decreased and presence of unclassified bacteria within the Bacteroidales order increased TNBC risk, and that several circulating metabolites altered BC risk (e.g., homostachydrine with overall BC and Luminal A BC, and betaine with TNBC). Whilst, in multivariable linear regression analyses, several of these metabolites were also associated with the microbial traits that influenced BC risk, importantly, given directional inconsistency of associations across analyses of microbial traits, metabolites and BC coupled with sensitivity analyses implying violations of MR assumptions, associations were unlikely to reflect causality nor a causal pathway between the gut microbiome, metabolites, and BC risk.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying therapeutic targets for cancer: 2,094 circulating proteins and risk of nine cancers 93%
- Cross-Cancer Evaluation of Polygenic Risk Scores for 17 Cancer Types in Two Large Cohorts 93%
- Risk factors for eight common cancers revealed from a phenome-wide Mendelian randomisation analysis of 378,142 cases and 485,715 controls 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Proteogenomic and observational evidence implicate ANGPTL4 as a potential therapeutic target for colorectal cancer prevention 93%
- A polygenic risk score for breast cancer in U.S. Latinas and Latin-American women 90%
- Genetic analysis of lung cancer reveals novel susceptibility loci and germline impact on somatic mutation burden 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Probing the diabetes and colorectal cancer relationship using gene – environment interaction analyses 91%
- Observational and genetic associations between cardiorespiratory fitness and cancer: a UK Biobank and international consortia study 91%
- MmCMS: Mouse models' Consensus Molecular Subtypes of colorectal cancer 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Aneuploidy and deregulated DNA damage response define haploinsufficiency in breast tissues of BRCA2 mutation carriers 91%
- The extracellular matrix drives guanylate production and protects pancreatic cancer cells from oxaliplatin-induced DNA damage. 91%
- Nicotinamide riboside improves muscle mitochondrial biogenesis, satellite cell differentiation and gut microbiota composition in a twin study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.