Back

Investigating Gene Expression Noise Reduction by MicroRNAs and MiRISC Reinforcement by Self-Feedback Regulation of mRNA Degradation

Tian, S.; Zhao, Z.; Kassie, M. G.; Zhang, F.; Ren, B.; Wang, D.

2025-02-15 systems biology
10.1101/2025.02.11.637731 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The microRNA (miRNA) induced silencing complex (miRISC) is the targeting apparatus and arguably the rate-limiting step of the miRNA-mediated regulatory subsystem - a major noise reducing, though metabolically costly, mechanism. Recently, we reported that miRISC channels miRNA-mediated regulatory activity back onto its own mRNAs to form negative self-feedback loops, a noise-reduction technique in engineering and synthetic/systems biology. In this paper, our mathematical modeling predicts that mRNA expression noise exhibits a negative correlation with the degradation rate (Kdeg) and is attenuated by self-feedback control of degradation. We also calculated Kdeg and expression noise of mRNAs detected in a total-RNA single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) dataset. As predicted, miRNA-targeted mRNAs exhibited higher Kdeg values accompanied by reduced inter-cell expression noise, confirming the operational trade-off between noise suppression and the increased metabolic/energetic costs associated with producing these mRNAs subjected to accelerated degradation and translational inhibition. Moreover, consistent with the Kdeg self-feedback control model, miRISC mRNAs (AGO1/2/3 and TNRC6A/B/C) exhibited further reduced expression noise. In summary, mathematical-modeling and total-RNA scRNA-seq data-analyses provide evidence that negative self-feedback regulation of mRNA degradation reinforces miRISC, the core machinery of the miRNA-mediated noise-reduction subsystem. To our knowledge, this is the first study to concurrently analyze mRNA degradation dynamics and expression noise, and to demonstrate noise reduction by self-feedback regulation of mRNA degradation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.