Back

Targeting lysosomal damage is a new therapeutic perspective for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Jaber, A.; Palmieri, L.; Bakour, R.; Lachiver, E.; Vu Hong, A.; Bourg, N.; Poupiot, J.; Albini, S.; Stockholm, D.; Van Wittenberghe, L.; Miranda, A.; Daniele, N.; Barthelemy, I.; Blot, S.; Evangelista, T.; Bui, T. M.; Richard, I.; Israeli, D.

2025-02-13 physiology
10.1101/2025.02.11.637610 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), a muscle degenerative disease affecting young boys, arises from the loss of dystrophin. Current gene therapy approaches aim to restore a shortened form of dystrophin (microdystrophin) via Adeno-Associated Vector (AAV) delivery, but clinical studies show limited efficacy, emphasizing the need for improved strategies such as combined therapies. In this study, we identified lysosomal perturbations in the myofibers of DMD patients and animal models, an overlooked mechanism of cellular damage in muscular dystrophies. These were notably marked by the upregulation and recruitment of Galectin-3, a known biomarker of lysosomal membrane permeabilization, to damaged lysosomes, alongside alterations in lysosome number, morphology, and activation of endolysosomal damage response. Importantly, microdystrophin therapy in Dmdmdx mice fails to fully correct these damages. However, combining it with trehalose, a lysosome-protective disaccharide, significantly improves outcome, enhancing muscle function, histology and transcriptome. These findings highlight lysosomal damage as a novel mechanism in DMD pathogenesis and suggest that combining trehalose with gene therapy could enhance therapeutic efficacy. TeaserLysosomal damage contributes to DMD pathology and is an interesting therapeutic target worth considering for current and future approaches.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.