Back

Projected ecological and disruptive impacts of climate change on malaria in Africa

Symons, T. L.; Moran, A.; Balzarolo, A.; Vargas, C.; Robertson, M.; Lubinda, J.; Saddler, A.; McPhail, M.; Harris, J.; Rozier, J.; Browne, A.; Amratia, P.; Bertozzi-Villa, A.; Bhatt, S.; Cameron, E.; Golding, N.; Smith, D. L.; Noor, A. M.; Rumisha, S. F.; Palmer, M. D.; Weiss, D. J.; Desai, N.; Potere, D.; Sukitsch, N.; Woods, W.; Gething, P. W.

2025-02-14 infectious diseases Community evaluation
10.1101/2025.02.11.25322113 medRxiv
Show abstract

The implications of climate change for malaria eradication in the 21st century remain poorly resolved. Many studies have focussed on parasite and vector ecology in isolation, neglecting the interactions between climate, malaria control, and the socioeconomic environment, including the disruptive impact of extreme weather. Here we integrate 25 years of data on climate, malaria burden, control interventions, socioeconomic factors, and extreme weather events in Africa. Using a geotemporal model linked to an ensemble of climate projections under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2-4.5 (SSP 2-4.5) scenario, we estimate the future impact of climate change on malaria burden in Africa, accounting for both ecological and disruptive effects. Our findings suggest climate change could lead to 123 million (projection range 49.5 million - 203 million) additional malaria cases and 532,000 (195,000 - 912,000) additional deaths in Africa between 2024 and 2050 under current control levels. Contrary to the prevailing focus on ecological mechanisms, extreme weather events emerge as the primary driver of increased risk, accounting for 79% (50-94%) of additional cases and 93% (70%-100%) of additional deaths. Most increases are due to intensification in existing endemic areas rather than range expansion, with significant regional variation in impact. These results highlight the urgent need for climate-resilient malaria control strategies and robust emergency response systems to safeguard progress toward malaria eradication in Africa.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.