Back

Effectiveness of Carotid Sinus Massage in Modified Trendelenburg Position for Rapid and Lasting Relief of Acute Headache Episodes: A Pilot Study

Anaya, P.; Suarez-Roca, H.

2025-02-13 pain medicine
10.1101/2025.02.11.25321880 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionHeadaches significantly impair quality of life, and primary headaches are among the most common neurological complaints. Stimulating carotid baroreceptors via carotid sinus massage (CSM) combined with modified Trendelenburg positioning may modulate autonomic activity and alleviate acute headache symptoms. Thus, this study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this combined approach (CSM+T). MethodsSeventeen patients (14 females; ages 16-64) with tension-type headaches (6), chronic migraines (10), or mixed-headaches (1) and various comorbidities received up to three 15-second CSM+T applications at one-minute intervals. Pain was assessed using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), while heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded before and after the intervention. A 24-hour follow-up evaluated headache recurrence and adverse effects. ResultsSixteen patients experienced significant pain reduction (median decrease: 9 VAS points; p < 0.0001) without complications. Pain relief persisted 24 hours without the need for additional medication or adverse effects. HR, BP, and SpO2 decreased following CSM+T. A negative correlation was observed between HR reduction and pain relief. Among responders, migraine patients had a smaller mean HR decrease than tension-type headache patients, yet both groups achieved similar median pain relief. These results suggest that a more pronounced cardiovagal response does not necessarily confer greater analgesia, implying additional central or multifactorial mechanisms. ConclusionCSM+T appears to be a safe and effective non-pharmacological intervention for rapid headache relief in a heterogeneous patient population. Larger, controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings and refine clinical protocols.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.