Back

Effectiveness of Carotid Sinus Massage in Modified Trendelenburg Position for Rapid and Lasting Relief of Acute Headache Episodes: A Pilot Study

Anaya, P.; Suarez-Roca, H.

2025-02-13 pain medicine
10.1101/2025.02.11.25321880
Show abstract

IntroductionHeadaches significantly impair quality of life, and primary headaches are among the most common neurological complaints. Stimulating carotid baroreceptors via carotid sinus massage (CSM) combined with modified Trendelenburg positioning may modulate autonomic activity and alleviate acute headache symptoms. Thus, this study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this combined approach (CSM+T). MethodsSeventeen patients (14 females; ages 16-64) with tension-type headaches (6), chronic migraines (10), or mixed-headaches (1) and various comorbidities received up to three 15-second CSM+T applications at one-minute intervals. Pain was assessed using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), while heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded before and after the intervention. A 24-hour follow-up evaluated headache recurrence and adverse effects. ResultsSixteen patients experienced significant pain reduction (median decrease: 9 VAS points; p < 0.0001) without complications. Pain relief persisted 24 hours without the need for additional medication or adverse effects. HR, BP, and SpO2 decreased following CSM+T. A negative correlation was observed between HR reduction and pain relief. Among responders, migraine patients had a smaller mean HR decrease than tension-type headache patients, yet both groups achieved similar median pain relief. These results suggest that a more pronounced cardiovagal response does not necessarily confer greater analgesia, implying additional central or multifactorial mechanisms. ConclusionCSM+T appears to be a safe and effective non-pharmacological intervention for rapid headache relief in a heterogeneous patient population. Larger, controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings and refine clinical protocols.

Matching journals

1
Pain
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 15 published papers
#1
355× avg
2
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
102× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 60%
7.1%
4
The Journal of Pain
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.4%
76× avg
5
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 32%
5.7%
6
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.3%
72× avg
7
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Wiley · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.6%
28× avg
8
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 7%
2.7× avg
9
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
10
Clinical and Translational Science
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 11%
2.0× avg
12
Brain
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 69 published papers
Top 6%
2.3× avg
13
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 48%
0.9%
14
Blood Advances
American Society of Hematology · based on 16 published papers
Top 1.0%
11× avg
15
Brain Sciences
MDPI AG · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
9.7× avg
16
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
9.5× avg
17
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 31%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 140 published papers
Top 7%
2.3× avg
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 29 published papers
Top 4%
4.8× avg