Back

The extensive diversity of nairoviruses reveals the complexity and high risk of tick-borne diseases in northeastern China

Wang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wei, Z.; Liu, Y.

2025-02-09 microbiology
10.1101/2025.02.08.637282 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The increasing burden of tick-borne virus infections is becoming a global public health concern. In the current study, we identified nine tick-borne nairoviral species in northeastern China through metagenomic sequencing, which are phylogenetic classified into four groups: I) Wetland virus (WELV), II;) Songling virus (SGLV), Jian nairovirus (JANV), Yanbian nairo tick virus 1 (YBNTV-1), Shanxi tick virus 2 (SXTV-2), III;) Yezo virus (YEZV), and IV;) Beiji nairovirus (BJNV), Yichun nairovirus (YCNV), and Hunchun nairovirus (HCNV). These nairoviruses are influenced by both the species of ticks and their geographical distribution. Apart from the previously isolated pathogenic WELV, SGLV, YEZV, and BJNV, we successfully isolated JANV and YBNTV-1, which can replicate in Vero and HEK-293T cells. Two routes of nairovirus spread into northeastern China were evaluated. Group I and II viruses, vectored by Haemaphysalis sp. ticks, likely originated in Central or East China and spread via migratory birds along the Chinese coastline. Group III; and IV viruses, vectored by Ixodes persulcatus ticks, are believed to have originated in Europe and spread via rodents across the Eurasian continent. Our study reveals the extensive diversity and wide distribution of tick-borne nairoviruses in northeastern China, highlights the potential pathogenic risk of the newly discovered nairoviruses, and clarifies their origins and potential migration routes. The results will be of crucial significance for the tick-borne diseases control and prevention in China.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.