Back

High-throughput behavioural phenotyping of 25 C. elegans disease models including patient-specific mutations

O'Brien, T. J.; Navarro, E. P.; Barroso, C.; Menzies, L.; Martinez-Perez, E.; Carling, D.; Brown, A. E. X.

2025-02-08 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.02.07.637026 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genetic diagnosis is fast and cheap, challenging our capacity to evaluate the functional impact of novel disease-causing variants or identify potential therapeutics. Model organisms including C. elegans present the possibility of systematically modelling genetic diseases, yet robust, high-throughput methods have been lacking. Here we show that automated multi-dimensional behaviour tracking can detect phenotypes in 25 new C. elegans disease models spanning homozygous loss-of-function alleles and patient-specific single-amino-acid substitutions. We find that homozygous loss-of-function (LoF) mutants across diverse genetic pathways (including BORC, FLCN, and FNIP-2) exhibit strong, readily detectable abnormalities in posture, locomotion, and stimulus responses compared to wild-type animals. An smc-3 mutant strain--modelled by introducing a patient-identified missense change--causes developmental anomalies and distinct behavioural profiles even though complete loss of SMC-3 is lethal. In contrast, patient-derived missense mutations in another essential gene, tnpo-2, did not show a strong phenotype initially but it could be "sensitized" chemically (e.g., with aldicarb), potentially facilitating future drug screens. Our findings show that scalable behavioural phenotyping can capture a wide range of mutant effects--from strong to subtle--in patient-avatar worm lines. We anticipate that this standardized approach will enable systematic drug repurposing for rare genetic disorders as new disease variants are discovered.

Published in BMC Biology (predicted rank #16) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.