Back

Effects of food insecurity on infant feeding confidence and practices during the COVID-19 pandemic and its waves

Hussain, M.; Hyun, J.; Arduin, E.; Kyle, M. H.; Abreu, W.; Scripps, T.; Nichols, P. H.; Khan, A.; Glassman, M.; Stockwell, M. S.; Walzer, L.; Dumitriu, D.; Fernandez, C. R.

2025-02-10 nutrition
10.1101/2025.02.07.25321881 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has intensified economic hardships, with potential negative impacts on food insecurity and infant feeding beliefs and practices. The relationship between food insecurity and infant feeding beliefs and practices during the pandemic is not yet fully understood. Neither is how these relationships changed over the course of the waves of the pandemic. We examined these relationships in a cohort of infants born during the various waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City (NYC). MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of infants enrolled from birth into the COVID-19 Mother-Baby Outcomes (COMBO) study and born March 2020 to May 2024. We measured food insecurity in the prior 30 days with a 2-item survey adapted from Hunger Vital Sign, infant feeding confidence at hospital discharge, and current infant feeding practices. ResultsIn our sample, 40% of women had been exposed to prenatal SARS-CoV-2 infection and approximately 24% of mothers were food insecure. There was a significant association between food insecurity and prenatal SARS-CoV-2 infection, Spanish as ones preferred language, and self-identifying as Latina. In unadjusted models of the entire sample, food insecurity was associated with formula feeding, with 44% of food insecure mothers opting to formula feed vs. 28% of food secure mothers (p<0.001), but this relationship was no longer significant after adjusting for covariates (p=0.059). In comparing the first and second waves of the pandemic (March 2020-December 2021 vs. January 2022-May 2024), there was no significant difference in rate of food insecurity. When comparing different waves of the pandemic, food insecurity was associated with increased likelihood of formula feeding, even after adjusting for confounders. DiscussionFood insecurity was initially associated with feeding methods, but this relationship lost significance after adjusting for confounders. However, when analyzed separately, food insecurity was significantly linked to lower odds of exclusive breastfeeding during different waves of the pandemic, suggesting the influence of external factors like policy changes and social support variations. Other factors, such as maternal BMI, ethnicity, and delivery mode, were also significantly associated with breastfeeding practices, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to support breastfeeding, especially among food-insecure mothers.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
43.0%
2
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.4%
6
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
9
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
12
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
13
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
15
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
17
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%