Back

Circulating causal protein networks linked to future risk of myocardial infarction

Emilsson, V.; Bankier, S.; Gudmundsdottir, V.; Jonmundsson, T.; Bjarnadottir, H.; Loureiro, J.; Wang, L.; Finkel, N.; Orth, A. P.; Aspelund, T.; Launer, L. J.; Bjorkegren, J. L.; Jennings, L. L.; Lamb, J. R.; Gudnason, V.; Michoel, T.

2025-02-08 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.02.07.25321789 medRxiv
Show abstract

Variations in blood protein levels have been associated with a broad spectrum of complex diseases, including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACVD). These associations highlight the intricate interplay between local (e.g., cardiovascular) and systemic (non-cardiovascular) factors for the development of ACVD, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive, systems-level understanding of its etiology. To accomplish this, we developed a causal network inference framework by analyzing one of the largest serum proteomics studies to date, the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study (AGES), a prospective population-based study of 7,523 serum proteins measured in 5,376 older adults. To reconstruct a causal network of serum proteins, we used cis-acting protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) as instrumental variables to infer causal relationships between protein pairs, while accounting for potential unobserved confounding factors. We identified 185 causal protein subnetworks (FDR = 1%, n [≥] 10 members), which collectively interacted with 5,611 target proteins, offering valuable biological insights and an overview of systemic homeostasis. Several subnetworks, many of which interact to establish a hierarchy of directional relationships, were significantly associated with future myocardial infarction and/or its long-term complications like heart failure, as well as with key cardiometabolic traits that contribute to the onset of ACVD.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.