Back

Spatial biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: the DUTRENEO trial

Grande, E.; Sibai, M.; Andrada, E.; Grases, D.; Reig, O.; Escobosa, M.; Perez, E.; Marques, M.; Martinez-Villarreal, J.; Benitez, R.; Malats, N.; Moreno, A.; Garcia, J.; Galvan, P.; Prat, A.; Azueta, A.; Castellano, D.; Guerrero, F.; Puente, J.; Galante, M. I.; Font, A.; Garcia Del Muro, F. J.; Alonso, T.; Burgos, J.; Pinto, A.; Alvarez, M.; Climent, M. A.; Paramio, J.; Maroto, P.; Dominguez, M.; Duran, I.; Porta-Pardo, E.; Real, F. X.

2025-02-10 oncology
10.1101/2025.02.07.25321742 medRxiv
Show abstract

Many studies have reported biomarkers predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) based on retrospective analyses. However, few clinical trials have tested their value prospectively. The DUTRENEO trial (EudraCT: 2017-002246-6) investigated whether an 18-gene Tumour Inflammation Signature (TIS) that can robustly identify patients who respond to ICI in multiple tumour types could stratify patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) to receive neoadjuvant ICI (durvalumab+tremelimumab) or standard cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Patients with TIS-high tumors were randomized to ICI or NAC, while patients with TIS-low tumors received NAC. A total of 73 patients were treated. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates were 38.5% (TIS-High, ICI), 30% (TIS-High, NAC), and 55% (TIS-Low, NAC) (p = 0.349), indicating that - as applied - the TIS score did not significantly enrich in responders to ICI. Post-hoc analysis showed that higher TIS thresholds improved prediction of response to ICI but excluded many responders. Multi-omics analyses of pre-treatment samples, including whole-exome sequencing, bulk RNA sequencing, and spatial transcriptomics (Visium, Xenium), revealed that bulk RNA response signatures originated mainly from cancer cells. Spatial transcriptomics showed that ICI response was associated with proximity between cancer cells and adaptive immune cells, while resistance to NAC was linked to phenotypic plasticity of cancer cells despite low genetic diversity. The unique design of the DUTRENEO trial underscores the challenges of translating retrospective biomarkers into clinical practice and highlights the importance of spatial features in understanding tumour-immune interactions. These findings suggest that integrating spatial and multi-modal biomarkers in well-designed clinical trials could improve stratification and response prediction to select neoadjuvant therapy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.6%
10
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
16
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
28
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
29
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%