Back

A Dapl1+ subpopulation of naive CD8 T cells contains committed precursors of memory lineage.

Lynch, A. C.; Hioki, K. A.; Liang, X.; Thesmar, I.; Cernjul, J.; He, X.; Mager, J.; Cui, W.; Alfandari, D.; Pobezinskaya, E. E.; Pobezinsky, L. A.

2025-02-08 immunology
10.1101/2025.02.06.636941 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Memory CD8 T cells play a vital role in providing lasting immune protection, yet their origins remain incompletely understood. Contrary to classical models, emerging evidence suggests that heterogeneity within the naive T cell pool may influence fate decisions prior to antigen encounter. However, the markers of naive T cell heterogeneity have not yet been clearly defined. Here, we describe intraclonal heterogeneity within the naive T cell population marked by the protein Dapl1. Using novel monoclonal antibodies and a reporter-knockout mouse model, we found that Dapl1-positive naive CD8 T cells exhibit distinct phenotypes compared to their Dapl1-negative counterparts. Furthermore, this population includes a subset of pre-programmed precursors biased toward memory lineage fate. The differentiation of these precursors is independent of Dapl1 but relies on the transcription factor Bcl11b, resulting in the generation of Dapl1-positive central memory-like CD8 T cells in response to infection, and stem-like memory cells in response to cancer. Notably, naive Dapl1-positive T cells originate among mature thymocytes and gradually appear in the periphery within several days after birth. Our findings suggest that committed memory precursors in the Dapl1-positive population may represent an alternative pathway for memory CD8 T cell generation, offering new avenues for therapeutic application. ONE-SENTENCE SUMMARYNaive Dapl1 positive CD8 T cells include a pre-programmed subset biased toward differentiation into memory-like T cells.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.