Back

Dissection of retrosplenial cortex inputs: ubiquitous drive from anterior thalamus

Margetts-Smith, G.; Andrianova, L.; Kohli, S.; Randall, A. D.; Aggleton, J. P.; Witton, J.; Craig, M.

2025-02-08 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.02.06.636939 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The retrosplenial cortex (RSC) is a highly interconnected brain region involved in spatial navigation and associative learning. It forms extensive, reciprocal connections with sensory, hippocampal, parahippocampal, prefrontal, and thalamic areas. RSC comprises granular (gRSC) and dysgranular (dRSC) subdivisions with distinct connectivity and functions. Despite its emerging role in behaviour and its implication in memory-related disorders such as Alzheimers disease, the nature of its synaptic inputs remains poorly understood. Here, we combined viral anatomical tracing, optogenetic stimulation, and patch-clamp electrophysiology to investigate inputs from the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), dorsal subiculum (dSub), and anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN) to gRSC and dRSC. Strikingly, all recorded RSC pyramidal neurons received ATN input, regardless of subdivision or cortical layer. Activation of ATN inputs evoked significantly larger post-synaptic responses than those from dSub or ACC, though both regions maintained substantial connectivity with RSC. While dSub projections appeared denser in gRSC, synaptic responses were larger in dRSC, albeit with lower input probability. Notably, NMDA receptor-mediated components of RSC excitatory inputs were weaker than expected, potentially explaining the reported inability to induce long-term potentiation in RSC in ex vivo neurophysiology experiments. This is the first study to characterise the synaptic properties of retrosplenial afferents. Our findings highlight the dominant influence of ATN inputs and raise important questions about how RSCs long-range connectivity supports its roles in memory and spatial navigation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.