Back

WormAI: Artificial Intelligence of Networks for Nematode Phenotyping

Lieu, M.; Cao, Q.; Meng, R.; Zhang, D.; Chauhan, V. M.

2025-02-08 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.02.06.636827 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is a key model organism in biological research due to its genetic similarity to humans and its utility in studying complex processes. Traditional image analysis methods, such as those using ImageJ, are labour-intensive, which has led to the integration of AI. This study introduces an AI framework with three machine learning models: WormGAN, a Generative Adversarial Network for generating synthetic nematode images to enhance training data; WormDET, for precise movement tracking; and WormREG, for accurate anatomical measurements. Together, these tools significantly improve the efficiency and accuracy of phenotypic analysis. WormAI demonstrates substantial potential for high-throughput dataset analysis, advancing research in systems biology, drug discovery, and aging. This framework streamlines workflows, enabling faster and more precise discoveries in C. elegans studies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
31.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
8.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Machine Intelligence
○ 70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
8
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
9
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
10
Advanced Intelligent Systems
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
PLOS Digital Health
● 106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
12
Patterns
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
13
Biology Methods and Protocols
◐ 61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
14
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
15
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
16
IEEE Access
● 35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
17
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
20
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
○ 176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.