Back

Unprecedented Number of Recurrent Mutations Drive the Rapid Evolution of Pesticide Resistance in a Notorious Pest

Cao, L.-J.; Chen, J.-C.; Thai, J.; Schmidt, T.; Ffrench-Constant, R.; Zhang, L.-X.; Yang, Y.; Yuan, M.-C.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Yang, Q.; Gong, Y.-J.; Li, H.; Chen, X.; Hoffmann, A.; Wei, S.-J.

2025-02-07 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.02.06.636798 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The genetic basis of pesticide resistance has been widely studied, but the exact nature of this evolutionary process in the field is often unclear, particularly when a limited number of populations is considered and when there is a lag between the evolutionary event and its investigation. We showed that an unprecedented number of recurrently evolved mutations in an arthropod pest, the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae, drive the rapid evolution of resistance to a recently commercialized acaricide, cyetpyrafen. We first observed high levels of resistance that appeared and became widespread within three years. Genome scans revealed genetic heterogeneity of resistance among populations and identified 15 target mutations, including six mutations on five amino acid residues of subunit sdhB, and nine mutations on three amino acid residues of subunit sdhD of the pesticide target succinate dehydrogenase, with as many as five substitutions on one residue. No mutations were present in 2666 screened historical specimens, suggesting that mutations arose rapidly through de novo substitutions or from very rare segregating mutations. Identical mutations recurrently appeared in different genetic backgrounds, increasing the likelihood of resistance evolution. The high number of mutational options available for the evolution of target site resistance in this pest challenges resistance management practices.

Published in eLife (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.